Two-Layer Antireflection Coating for Low-Index Substrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current antireflection coatings are ineffective for substrates with low refractive indices (n substrate <2.5) and require multiple technological steps, limiting their application and efficiency across broader ranges of wavelengths and angles of incidence.

Innovation Solution

A two-layer antireflection coating comprising a transparent first layer with a thickness of 10-70 nm and refractive index of 1.05<n 1 <1.35, and a second layer with a thickness of 30-100 nm and refractive index of 1.25<n 2 <1.5, applied using the sol-gel technique and dip coating technology, where n 1 <n 2, optimizing the antireflection effect.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a two-layer antireflection coating is applied to achieve better antireflection effect across broader ranges of wavelengths and angles of incidence, then the antireflection performance is improved, but the number of technological steps and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantireflection performanceVSAvoidnumber of layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by carefully controlling the refractive index values (n1=1.30-1.60 for first layer, n2=1.65-1.95 for second layer) and thickness values (d1=20-40 nm, d2=40-60 nm) of each layer to achieve optimal antireflection performance. This systematic parameter optimization allows the two-layer coating to effectively reduce reflection across broad wavelength and angle ranges while maintaining manageable manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional antireflection coatings with refractive index decreasing towards the outer environment are used, then the antireflection effect works for broader ranges, but the coatings are ineffective for substrates with low refractive indices (n substrate <2.5)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange of wavelengths and anglesVSAvoideffectiveness on low refractive index substrates
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by applying a layer with lower refractive index (n1=1.30-1.60) directly on the substrate and a layer with higher refractive index (n2=1.65-1.95) on top. This inverted sequence, combined with specific thickness ratios (d2>d1), enables effective antireflection on low refractive index substrates (n<2.5) while maintaining broad wavelength and angle coverage, directly addressing the limitation of conventional coatings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If multi-layer structures are formed to optimize antireflection effect, then the operation is optimized for broader ranges, but the costs and technological steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantireflection optimizationVSAvoidtechnological steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes manufacturing ease by controlling the thickness relationship between layers (d2>d1, with d1=20-40 nm and d2=40-60 nm) and using sol-gel dip coating technology. This approach achieves broad-spectrum antireflection optimization with only two layers, significantly reducing the number of technological steps compared to traditional multi-layer coatings while maintaining superior performance across wide wavelength and angle ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The coating significantly reduces light reflection and increases light transmission across a broad range of wavelengths and angles of incidence, improving luminous efficiency and image quality for substrates like glass and polycarbonate.

Implementation Method 1

Waves reflecting from upper and lower parts of thin layers applied on surfaces can partially or fully suppress or amplify each other depending on the relative phase between and the amplitude ratio of the wave reflected by the lower surface and the wave reflected by the upper surface when the two waves meet. By suitably choosing the refractive index and the layer thickness, it can be achieved that the waves reflected by the upper surface and the lower surface have got the same amplitude but are in reversed phase upon meeting; in such cases the phenomenon of extinction or destructive interference appears.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDestructive interference: Interference

Data Source

PatentEP3472248B1Antireflection film and its use on a substrate
Publication Date: 2021.08.11 HUNGARO LUX LIGHT KFT
  • EP3472248B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3472248B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3472248B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present invention relates to an antireflection film, as well as its use on a substrate (3) to decrease a fracture of light striking the substrate (3) reflected by said substrate (3), wherein said coating is formed of a transparent first layer (1) applied on the substrate (3) and a transparent second layer (2) on said first layer (1). The essence of the solutions according to the present invention is that thickness (d1) of the first layer (1) ranges from 10 to 70 nm and refractive index (ni) of said first layer (1) satisfies the relation 1.05&lt;n1&lt;1.35 within the wavelength range of 375 to 1000 nm, and wherein thickness (d2) of the second layer (2) ranges from 30 to 100 nm and refractive index (n2) of said second layer (2) satisfies the relation 1.25&lt;n2&lt;1.5 within the wavelength range of 375 to 1000 nm, and wherein n1&lt;n2 also holds.