Vehicle Antitheft Apparatus Dynamic Sensor Sensitivity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle antitheft systems with remote control capabilities often inadvertently trigger alarms due to vibrations caused by remotely controlled vehicle components, leading to false alarms or missed theft detection when sensitivity is lowered.

Innovation Solution

An antitheft apparatus with an intrusion detection control part that deactivates or adjusts the detection function of the intruder detection part during remote control operations, including deactivating the alarm, lowering sensitivity, extending detection time, and reverting to original settings after remote control is complete.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the sensitivity of the intrusion sensor is maintained high when the vehicle is parked, then theft detection capability is improved, but false alarms are triggered by vibrations from remote control operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse alarms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor sensitivity is made dynamic rather than static. The control unit adjusts the sensitivity level based on the operational state of vehicle components. When a remote control operation is detected, the sensitivity is temporarily reduced to prevent false alarms from vibration-induced signals, and then restored to high sensitivity when the operation completes, thereby adapting the detection threshold to current operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by monitoring the operational state of vehicle components and using this information to adjust sensor sensitivity. The control unit receives feedback about component operation status and automatically modulates the detection sensitivity accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that prevents false alarms while maintaining security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the sensitivity of the intrusion sensor is lowered to prevent false alarms during remote control, then false alarm reduction is achieved, but theft detection capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm frequencyVSAvoidtheft detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor sensitivity operates on a dynamic scale rather than a fixed level. The system transitions between high sensitivity and reduced sensitivity states based on real-time detection of remote control operations, ensuring that sensitivity is only temporarily reduced during actual component operations and immediately restored thereafter, thus maintaining overall detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit detects remote control operations in advance and proactively adjusts sensor sensitivity before false alarms can occur. By anticipating the vibration events associated with component operations, the system pre-reduces sensitivity during the operation window and restores it immediately after, preventing false alarms before they happen rather than reacting after detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the intrusion sensor remains constantly operational when the vehicle is parked, then security monitoring is improved, but remote control operations may accidentally activate the alarm

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity monitoringVSAvoidremote control operation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the operational state of vehicle components and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust sensor sensitivity. When component operation is detected during remote control, the system automatically reduces sensitivity to prevent false alarm activation, then restores monitoring sensitivity after the operation completes, creating an adaptive security system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Object-generated harmful factors

If the sensitivity of the intrusion sensor is adjusted during remote control operations, then false alarm prevention is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm preventionVSAvoidsensor control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit is designed to serve multiple functions: it manages remote control operations, monitors component operational states, detects vibration signals, and adjusts sensor sensitivity levels. By consolidating these diverse functions into a single multi-functional control unit, the system achieves false alarm prevention through sensitivity adjustment without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7449992B2Antitheft apparatus
Publication Date: 2008.11.11 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US7449992B2 patent drawing
  • US7449992B2 patent drawing
  • US7449992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses an antitheft apparatus mounted on a vehicle for protecting the vehicle from theft. The vehicle has a remote control device that controls a vehicle component of the vehicle in accordance with a control signal transmitted from a terminal. The antitheft apparatus includes an intruder detection part for detecting intrusion of an intruder, and an intrusion detection control part for controlling the detecting function of the intruder detection part during a period when the vehicle component is being controlled by the remote control device.