Antonym Vector Differentiation in Semantic Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural language processing techniques fail to accurately differentiate between antonyms in semantic information generation, as they assign similar vectors to words with opposite meanings based on distributional hypothesis, leading to incorrect determination of meaning similarity.

Innovation Solution

The method involves acquiring two text corpuses, one with a first word and another with a second word of different meaning, and performing a learning process to assign vectors in a vector space, ensuring the second word's vector is spaced by a predetermined distance from the first word's vector, thus differentiating their meanings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If distributional hypothesis is used to generate semantic information, then processing efficiency is improved, but accuracy in differentiating antonyms deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy in differentiating antonyms
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the learning process into two distinct phases: pre-training on general text corpus to capture distributional patterns, and fine-tuning on antonym pairs to correct semantic similarities. This segmentation allows the system to maintain processing efficiency from the distributional hypothesis while adding a targeted correction phase to improve antonym differentiation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the learning parameters by introducing a contrastive loss function that explicitly maximizes the distance between antonym vectors in the vector space. This parameter change transforms the standard word2vec objective into one that simultaneously captures distributional patterns and enforces semantic differentiation for antonyms, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If similar vectors are assigned to words with similar contexts, then semantic similarity is captured, but differentiation between words with opposite meanings is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic similarity captureVSAvoiddifferentiation between opposite meanings
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different word pairs differently during the fine-tuning phase. While most words continue to follow distributional similarity, antonym pairs receive special treatment through contrastive learning that explicitly differentiates their vector representations. This localized adjustment maintains overall semantic adaptability while improving reliability for antonym differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by first allowing the distributional hypothesis to create semantic similarities, then systematically correcting these similarities for antonym pairs through contrastive loss. This two-step approach first captures the natural semantic structure and then applies a counteracting force to ensure proper differentiation where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Loss of information

If word distribution patterns are used for learning, then general semantic understanding is improved, but specific antonym relationships are not adequately differentiated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneral semantic understandingVSAvoidantonym relationship differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges two learning approaches: distributional hypothesis learning from general text corpus and contrastive learning from antonym pairs. The combined approach maintains the general semantic understanding captured by distributional patterns while integrating specific antonym differentiation through the contrastive loss function, thus reducing information loss without sacrificing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10325023B2Method for assigning semantic information to word through learning using text corpus
Publication Date: 2019.06.18 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US10325023B2 patent drawing
  • US10325023B2 patent drawing
  • US10325023B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for controlling a device based on acquired text data. The method includes acquiring the text data indicating a voice spoken by a user, and analyzing a meaning of the text data based on a table, in which a word and a vector representing a meaning of the word in a vector space of predetermined dimensions are associated. The method also includes generating a command to control the device based on the analyzed meaning of the text data. The table is generated by performing a learning process by assigning to a first word a first vector representing a meaning of the first word in the vector space, and by assigning to a second word a second vector representing a meaning of the second word in the vector space, in accordance with an arrangement of a word string in a first text corpus and a second text corpus.