Impact Wrench Anvil Shank-Head Diameter Ratio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Anvil assemblies in impact wrenches experience high stress levels due to striking rotational force, leading to fatigue failure and potential fracture of the anvil head, reducing their operational life.

Innovation Solution

The design of the anvil features a shank and head with a diameter ratio between approximately 1:1 and 1.35:1, minimizing stress through a transition zone that reduces the stress between the shank and head, thereby increasing the anvil's useful life by distributing the force more effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the anvil head diameter is increased to withstand high stress, then the strength is improved, but the stress concentration at the shank-head junction increases leading to fatigue failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanvil head strengthVSAvoidanvil fatigue resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the diameter ratio between the shank and head to a specific range (1:1 to 1.35:1). This quantitative parameter adjustment reduces stress concentration at the junction while maintaining the head's strength to withstand high impact loads, thereby resolving the contradiction between strength and fatigue resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating a transition zone with specific geometric characteristics at the shank-head junction. This localized structural modification distributes stress more evenly in the critical junction area, preventing stress concentration that would lead to fatigue failure while preserving the overall strength of the anvil head

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of substance

If the anvil shank diameter is decreased to reduce material usage, then the manufacturing cost is reduced, but the stress distribution becomes uneven leading to head fracture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial usageVSAvoidanvil head integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by defining an optimal diameter ratio range (1:1 to 1.35:1) that balances material efficiency with structural integrity. This parameter optimization ensures adequate material distribution to prevent head fracture while minimizing overall material consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by designing a transition zone with specific geometric properties that ensures adequate material presence at the critical shank-head junction. This localized structural feature prevents stress concentration and head fracture while allowing the rest of the anvil to use material efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10850371B2Anvil for an impact wrench
Publication Date: 2020.12.01 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US10850371B2 patent drawing
  • US10850371B2 patent drawing
  • US10850371B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An anvil for use with an impact wrench includes a first end, a second end opposite the first end, a shank adjacent the first end, and a head adjacent the second end. The shank includes a diameter and an outer cylindrical surface that defines a longitudinal axis that extends centrally through the anvil between the first end and the second end. The head includes a plurality of planar faces and an outer cylindrical surface. The outer cylindrical surface defines a diameter of the head. A ratio between the diameter of the shank and the diameter of the head is between approximately 1:1 and approximately 1.35:1.