Wireless AP Channel Access Coordination for Low-Latency Time Regions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication networks lack mechanisms for reliable coordination between access points (APs) to prioritize channel access and ensure low-latency communication, especially when an ongoing channel access procedure intersects with a coordinated time region, leading to inefficient resource utilization and increased latency.

Innovation Solution

APs coordinate by receiving information about a coordinated time region and channel access parameters, allowing them to pause or interrupt their ongoing channel access procedures and resume or initiate new procedures in compliance with the indicated parameters, thereby ensuring prioritized access for high-priority traffic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If APs use traditional independent channel access procedures, then each AP can autonomously manage its own transmissions, but coordination between APs is insufficient leading to increased latency and inefficient resource utilization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access coordination reliabilityVSAvoidAP coordination mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having APs exchange coordination information and establish coordinated time regions before actual transmissions occur. APs prepare coordination parameters and schedule alignments in advance, allowing them to interrupt ongoing channel access procedures at predetermined times to ensure low-latency communication during coordinated periods without requiring complex real-time negotiation during transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of time

If APs interrupt ongoing channel access procedures to prioritize coordinated time regions, then low-latency communication is achieved, but channel access efficiency may be reduced due to frequent interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication latencyVSAvoidchannel access throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing adaptive channel access parameters that change based on the coordinated time region status. APs dynamically adjust their channel access behavior by interrupting ongoing procedures only when necessary to enter coordinated time regions, while maintaining normal access efficiency during non-coordinated periods. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize between latency and throughput based on real-time coordination needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If APs implement coordinated time regions with specific channel access parameters, then resource utilization efficiency improves, but the complexity of managing multiple access procedures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing resources efficiencyVSAvoidchannel access procedure management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the operational timeline into distinct coordinated time regions and non-coordinated periods. This temporal segmentation allows APs to manage complexity by handling different access procedures in separate time segments rather than simultaneously, reducing the cognitive load on the MAC layer while still achieving coordinated resource utilization across multiple APs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Stability of the object's composition

If APs continuously monitor and coordinate channel access, then synchronization between APs improves, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAP synchronization stabilityVSAvoidprocessing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by having APs exchange coordination information at predetermined intervals rather than continuously monitoring. This periodic coordination mechanism maintains synchronization stability by updating coordination parameters at scheduled times while significantly reducing processing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring and negotiation protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20250351172A1Coordinated channel access between wireless access points (APS)
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250351172A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351172A1 patent drawing
  • US20250351172A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure provides methods, components, devices and systems for coordinated channel access between wireless access points (APs). Some aspects more specifically relate to mechanisms according to which a first AP provides prioritized channel access for a second AP across various scenarios, including scenarios in which the first AP has an ongoing channel access procedure at a beginning of a coordinated time region of the second AP. The coordinated time region of the second AP may be associated with a first set of channel access parameters. In accordance with initiating a first channel access procedure prior to the coordinated time region in accordance with a second set of channel access parameters different than the first set of channel access parameters, the first AP may interrupt the first channel access procedure at or prior to the beginning of the coordinated time region.