Access Point Clock Recovery via Controller Timestamp Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless access points (APs) with abnormal clocks, such as running 2.5 times slower than controllers, can cause packet transmission failures and connectivity issues, as the controller is unaware of the discrepancy, requiring manual detection and recovery which is inconvenient for in-field deployment.

Innovation Solution

A method where a processor in the AP detects the time difference between its system clock and the controller's system clock through multiple synchronization procedures, determines if an abnormal clock is present, and automatically recovers the AP's system clock if necessary, while reporting the issue to the controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual detection and recovery methods are used for abnormal clocks in APs, then the complexity of the system is reduced, but the ease of operation and productivity deteriorate due to requiring manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The AP automatically detects its own clock abnormality by comparing timestamps with the controller and performs self-recovery by resetting its clock, eliminating the need for manual intervention. The system enables itself to monitor and correct clock issues independently through automated time synchronization procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the AP continuously monitors time differences with the controller, compares timestamps from multiple synchronization procedures, detects abnormalities when thresholds are exceeded, and triggers recovery actions based on this feedback loop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If automated detection and recovery mechanisms are implemented, then the ease of operation and productivity improve, but the device complexity increases due to additional monitoring and comparison functions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs self-diagnosis and self-recovery of clock abnormalities, improving productivity by eliminating manual intervention. The AP independently executes time synchronization, detects abnormalities, and recovers without external assistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple time synchronization procedures and compares timestamps to detect abnormalities, using a threshold-based approach that balances detection accuracy with computational resources. The recovery mechanism activates only when abnormalities are confirmed, avoiding unnecessary operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If no automated recovery is implemented, then the device complexity remains low, but the reliability deteriorates due to undetected clock abnormalities affecting network connectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors time synchronization status and detects clock abnormalities through feedback from timestamp comparisons. When the time difference exceeds the threshold, the system triggers automatic recovery to maintain network reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The AP autonomously detects and recovers from clock abnormalities, ensuring continuous reliable operation without manual intervention. The self-service mechanism maintains network connectivity by automatically correcting time synchronization issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Loss of time

If manual intervention is required for clock recovery, then the device complexity is low, but the loss of time increases due to manual detection and recovery processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss of timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary time synchronization procedures to establish baseline timestamps before detecting abnormalities. By pre-configuring synchronization intervals and thresholds, the system can quickly detect and respond to clock issues without manual intervention, reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated detection and recovery system eliminates the time required for manual intervention by performing self-diagnosis and self-recovery. The AP independently identifies clock abnormalities and executes recovery actions, significantly reducing the time loss associated with manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11582706B2Determine abnormal clock
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US11582706B2 patent drawing
  • US11582706B2 patent drawing
  • US11582706B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example device comprising: a processor to detect a time difference between a first system clock of an access point (AP) and a second system clock of a controller; determine whether the AP has abnormal dock based on the time difference; and automatically recover the first system clock of the AP when the AP has abnormal clock.