AP Direct-Path Timestamping for Multipath Distance Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large-scale indoor wireless networks, traditional methods for determining the distance between access points (APs) using Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol are inaccurate due to obstructions causing multipath signal propagation, leading to erroneous distance estimations and challenging timestamping tasks.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for classifying AP pairs as Line-of-Sight (LoS) or Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS) using channel diversity and dynamically tuning timestamping parameters, such as search window and threshold values, to accurately timestamp direct wireless path signals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional FTM protocol is used for distance measurement, then distance estimation can be performed, but measurement precision deteriorates due to multipath signal propagation caused by obstructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance estimation accuracyVSAvoidmultipath signal propagation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the received signal into multiple components corresponding to different propagation paths (direct path, reflected paths, diffracted paths). By identifying and isolating the direct path signal component from the multipath components, the system can timestamp only the direct path signal, thereby eliminating the harmful effects of multipath propagation on distance measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing stage that analyzes the received signal to identify characteristics of direct path versus multipath signals. This intermediary analysis enables the system to distinguish and select the direct path signal for timestamping, resolving the contradiction between performing distance measurement and avoiding multipath interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If signal timestamping is performed without distinguishing path types, then timestamping can be completed, but position determination accuracy deteriorates due to inclusion of non-direct path signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition determination accuracyVSAvoidsignal analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic threshold adjustment and adaptive parameter selection based on the received signal characteristics. The system dynamically identifies signal peaks, adjusts search windows, and selects appropriate timestamping parameters based on the detected signal environment, enabling accurate direct path signal identification without requiring overly complex fixed-rule systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing the received signal to identify direct path components without requiring external intervention or manual configuration. The timestamping mechanism uses the signal's own characteristics (arrival time, strength, propagation path indicators) to determine which components to timestamp, making the system self-sufficient in resolving the accuracy-complexity contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If APs are mounted on ceilings facing downward for client coverage, then client connectivity is improved, but direct wireless path signals between APs become difficult to obtain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclient connectivityVSAvoiddirect path signal detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the AP serve multiple functions: it maintains its primary function of providing downward client coverage while simultaneously performing bidirectional communication with other APs for location determination. The system processes signals from multiple directions and uses signal analysis to identify direct path components regardless of AP orientation, enabling the same infrastructure to serve both client connectivity and precise location measurement purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from relying on physical AP orientation to achieving direct path signals, instead using signal parameter analysis (arrival time, strength, propagation characteristics) to identify direct path components. This parameter-based identification method works regardless of how the APs are physically mounted or oriented, resolving the contradiction between optimal client coverage orientation and direct path signal detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250380235A1Timestamping of direct wireless path signal
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US20250380235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250380235A1 patent drawing
  • US20250380235A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method and an access point to timestamp a direct wireless path signal are presented. In an example method, a first AP receives a plurality of signals from a second AP and records a signal strength value and a time of arrival corresponding to each of the plurality of signals. Further, the first AP identifies one or more peak signal strength values in a search window preceding a highest signal strength value from the signal strength values. The first AP then selects a timestamp at a rising edge of an earliest peak greater than a threshold value as a time of arrival of the direct wireless path signal. Also, methods of dynamically tuning timestamping parameters, such as a search window and a threshold value are presented.