Aircraft APU Inlet Diverter Fairing Aerodynamic Drag Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diverter structures for aircraft APU air inlets generate additional aerodynamic drag, which increases fuel consumption and weight, and are complex and costly due to mechanical actuators required for movable doors, posing reliability issues.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of aerodynamically improved diverter structures with a smooth ramp design and fairing to reduce airflow detachment and drag, while maintaining functionality to prevent undesired fluid ingestion, using a diverter assembly with an S-shaped cross-sectional configuration and a fairing bracket for enhanced airflow distribution and pressure recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional diverter structures are used for aircraft APU air inlets, then the air inlet functionality is maintained, but aerodynamic drag increases and fuel consumption rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic dragVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The diverter structure employs a curved, aerodynamic profile instead of sharp edges or flat surfaces. The curved leading edge and streamlined body shape guide airflow smoothly around the APU inlet, reducing flow separation and wake formation, thereby minimizing pressure drag and skin friction drag while maintaining effective fluid diversion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The diverter geometry is optimized by varying key parameters such as curvature radius, thickness distribution, and angle of attack to achieve optimal aerodynamic performance. These parameter adjustments allow the structure to minimize drag coefficients while preserving its fluid diversion function across different flight conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If movable doors with mechanical actuators are used in diverter structures, then airflow control flexibility is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow control flexibilityVSAvoidmechanical actuator system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the complex mechanical actuator system and movable door mechanisms from the diverter structure. Instead, it employs a fixed, stationary diverter geometry that achieves airflow control through its aerodynamic shape alone, eliminating moving parts while maintaining functional effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The fixed diverter structure utilizes the aircraft's own airflow and pressure fields to achieve the desired fluid diversion and control functions without requiring external mechanical actuation systems. The aerodynamic forces themselves perform the control function that would otherwise require complex machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If fixed diverter structures are used, then device complexity is reduced, but aerodynamic drag and flow detachment increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidflow detachment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fixed diverter employs carefully designed curved surfaces with optimized radius of curvature to guide airflow smoothly around the APU inlet. These curved geometries prevent flow separation and detachment by maintaining attached flow conditions, achieving effective fluid diversion without the complexity of movable parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The improved diverter structures decrease excrescence drag, reduce fuel burn, and enhance APU efficiency by optimizing air flow and pressure recovery while adhering to design constraints and maintaining operational functionality.

Implementation Method 1

The fairing defines a relatively smooth ramp which slopes aftward toward the air inlet to thereby avoid airflow detachment forwardly of the air inlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic flow guidance: Boundary Layer

Implementation Method 2

a diverter structure at least substantially surrounding the air inlet... to thereby avoid airflow detachment forwardly of the air inlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid deflection: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentEP2610179B1Aircraft air inlet diverter assemblies with improved aerodynamic characteristics
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 EMBRAER SA
  • EP2610179B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2610179B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2610179B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Diverter assemblies 12 for aircraft air inlets 10 include a diverter structure at least substantially surrounding the air inlet, and a fairing 20 mounted to an upper edge of the diverter structure forwardly of the air inlet.