Apatite Sequestration of Technetium via In-Situ Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Technetium, a highly radioactive element, is difficult to capture and dispose of due to its anionic species form, which makes it mobile in the environment, and existing methods for isolating and disposing of fission products are not effective, leading to ongoing migration issues from storage sites and nuclear accident areas.

Innovation Solution

The formation of modified apatitic compounds in situ, using a solution with calcium, citrate, and phosphate in the presence of a reducing agent like stannous compounds, to create a permeable reactive barrier that selectively traps technetium, preventing its migration in soil and groundwater.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If excavation and removal of technetium contaminated soil is performed, then technetium can be removed from the site, but soil stability is compromised and additional technetium may be released

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnetium removalVSAvoidsoil stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A permeable reactive barrier is introduced as an intermediary substance between the technetium source and the environment. This barrier chemically interacts with technetium to immobilize it through reduction and sorption, preventing migration without requiring physical excavation that would compromise soil stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical approach of excavation and physical removal is replaced with a chemical approach using in-situ chemical reduction and sorption. The barrier materials chemically transform technetium from a mobile anionic form to an immobilized reduced form, eliminating the need for disruptive mechanical excavation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If impermeable barriers are installed to prevent technetium migration, then contaminant movement is blocked, but soil disturbance is significant and continuous barriers are difficult to form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontaminant containmentVSAvoidbarrier installation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Permeable reactive barriers composed of granular materials like zero-valent iron, biodegradable polymers, or organic matter are used instead of impermeable concrete or steel barriers. These porous materials allow water flow while providing extensive surface area for technetium sorption and reduction, achieving containment without the complexity of forming continuous impermeable seals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier materials perform self-service functions through in-situ chemical reactions. Zero-valent iron spontaneously reduces technetium upon contact, and organic matter naturally sorbs technetium from groundwater, eliminating the need for complex installation procedures to create continuous seals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If conventional cationic sorbents are used to isolate fission products, then cesium and strontium can be captured, but technetium remains mobile due to its anionic species form

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefission product isolationVSAvoidtechnetium binding capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The chemical parameters of the sorbent materials are changed from cationic to include anionic and neutral forms. This includes using zero-valent iron for reduction, biodegradable polymers with functional groups for anionic sorption, and organic matter that can bind technetium in its anionic pertechnetate form, thereby adapting the isolation mechanism to work with technetium's unique chemistry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Composite barrier materials combining multiple mechanisms are employed: zero-valent iron particles embedded in biodegradable polymer matrices, or mixtures of organic matter with specialized sorbents. These composites provide both reduction capability and anionic sorption capacity, making the barrier effective against technetium while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively sequesters technetium, forming a stable apatite barrier that immobilizes the element, reducing its mobility and facilitating cost-efficient containment without disturbing the soil, even in challenging geological formations.

Implementation Method 1

the technetium is absorbed by the apatite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSorption: Sorption

Implementation Method 2

contacting the technetium with the apatite under conditions by which the technetium is absorbed by the apatite; contacting the fluid with apatite under technetium reducing conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Data Source

PatentUS9443627B1Apatite sequestration of technetium
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US9443627B1 patent drawing
  • US9443627B1 patent drawing
  • US9443627B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for sequestering technetium is disclosed. The method includes contacting technetium with apatite under reducing conditions whereby the technetium is absorbed by the apatite.