Aperiodic Active Discrete Lens Antenna Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional multibeam antennas for satellite applications face challenges such as high cost, complexity, and weight due to the need for large electric dimensions, complex beam-forming networks, and significant power losses in passive lens antennas, which affect signal-to-noise ratio and lead to spillover losses.

Innovation Solution

An active discrete lens multibeam antenna with aperiodic radiating elements and power amplifiers is designed, where the spacing of elements on the front array is used to achieve 'density tapering' and reduce the number of radiating elements, thereby reducing the antenna's volume, mass, and cost, while maintaining radiative performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional passive lens antennas are used, then the antenna structure is simpler, but significant power losses occur reducing signal-to-noise ratio and causing spillover losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower lossesVSAvoidantenna structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a static passive lens to a dynamic active lens system where amplifiers are strategically placed at the back array to dynamically compensate for power losses and spillover effects, adapting the signal amplification based on position and required beam formation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the operational parameters of the lens elements from passive transmission to active amplification, transforming the system's energy characteristics to overcome inherent losses while maintaining the discrete lens architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a large number of radiating elements are used in both front and back arrays, then radiative performance is improved, but the antenna volume, mass, and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiative performanceVSAvoidantenna mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes elements from the front array, demonstrating that the back array alone can provide sufficient radiative performance when properly designed and amplified, thereby reducing overall system mass and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies partial action by using only the back array for active radiation elements, which is sufficient to achieve the required radiative performance when combined with proper amplification, rather than requiring complete symmetry between front and back arrays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If equispaced elements are used in the front array, then manufacturing is simplified, but the number of radiating elements must be large to achieve proper edge tapering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearray element spacingVSAvoidnumber of radiating elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the element spacing of the front array, using non-uniform spacing to achieve proper edge tapering and radiation patterns without requiring a large number of elements, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining manufacturability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The aperiodic active lens antenna achieves improved radiative performance, reduced volume and mass, and lower complexity, with a 25-50% reduction in the number of radiating elements, and enhanced edge taper, leading to better radiation patterns and reduced spillover losses.

Implementation Method 1

a set of power amplifiers for amplifying signals transmitted through said connections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPower amplification:

Implementation Method 2

the whole structure behaves like a converging lens

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic wave focusing: Focusing

Implementation Method 3

the field generated by each feed is converted by the lens into a directive beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic lens effect: Lens

Data Source

PatentEP2221919B1Multibeam active discrete lens antenna
Publication Date: 2018.11.28 EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY
  • EP2221919B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2221919B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2221919B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A multibeam antenna comprising: a plurality of primary radiating elements (1), each associated to a respective beam; and an active radiating structure comprising a first planar array of radiating elements (2), a second planar array composed by a same number of radiating elements (3), a set of connections (5) between each radiating element of the first planar array and one corresponding element of the second planar array, and a set of power amplifiers (9) for amplifying signals transmitted through said connections; wherein: the relative positions of the radiating elements of the first and second planar arrays and phase delays introduced by said connections are such that the radiating structure forms an active discrete converging lens; and said primary radiating elements are clustered on a focal surface (G) of said lens, facing the first planar array; characterized in that said first and second planar arrays are both aperiodic. A method of manufacturing such an antenna.