API-Based Ophthalmology Imaging Control for Seamless Diagnosis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ophthalmology imaging systems require dedicated software for each device, leading to increased human, time, and financial costs due to separate data registration and adaptation to new devices, complicating seamless operations from image capture to diagnosis support.

Innovation Solution

An ophthalmology information processing system that generates instructions via an API or SDK to control ophthalmology imaging devices, enabling seamless operations from image capture to diagnosis support, allowing devices to operate in remote or local modes, and reducing the need for separate data registration and management of identification information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dedicated software is used for each ophthalmology imaging device, then device-specific functionality is optimized, but system complexity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice-specific functionalityVSAvoidsoftware system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal control system that can operate multiple ophthalmology imaging devices through a standardized interface. The system includes a device selection unit and control unit that can switch between different imaging devices (fundus camera, OCT, SLO) using common control logic, eliminating the need for separate dedicated software for each device while maintaining device-specific functionality through configured parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a standardized interface as an intermediary layer between the control system and various ophthalmology imaging devices. This interface includes standardized commands for image acquisition, data transmission, and device control, allowing the control system to communicate with different devices without direct device-specific programming, thus reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If separate data registration is performed for each imaging device, then device data can be accurately registered, but time and human resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata registration accuracyVSAvoiddata registration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter change principles by allowing the system to switch between different imaging devices through configuration parameters rather than physical reconfiguration. The control unit changes operational parameters to adapt to different device types (fundus camera, OCT, SLO) while maintaining consistent data registration processes, thereby achieving accurate registration without time-consuming device-specific setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary device selection and configuration before data registration begins. The device selection unit pre-identifies the target imaging device and loads the corresponding control parameters in advance, allowing the data registration process to proceed directly without time-consuming initial setup or reconfiguration for each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If adaptation to new imaging devices is required, then device-specific features can be optimized, but development costs and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice feature optimizationVSAvoidadaptation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed with universal adaptability to handle multiple ophthalmology imaging devices through a single standardized control architecture. When a new device is introduced, the system can accommodate it by adding device-specific parameters to the existing control framework rather than requiring complete software redevelopment, thus optimizing device features while minimizing adaptation time and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If centralized control is implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized interface acts as an intermediary that simplifies the control system architecture by providing a uniform layer of abstraction. This interface handles the complexity of device-specific communication protocols internally, allowing the centralized control unit to issue simple, device-agnostic commands while maintaining high operational efficiency across different imaging devices without increasing visible system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12407919B2Ophthalmology information processing method, control method, and ophthalmology information processing system
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 NIDEK CO LTD
  • US12407919B2 patent drawing
  • US12407919B2 patent drawing
  • US12407919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method includes: an instruction step of transmitting an instruction to an ophthalmological imaging device to execute an imaging-related operation; an acquisition step of acquiring, from the ophthalmology imaging device, a subject's eye image taken in accordance with the instruction; and a diagnosis support step of outputting diagnosis support information for the subject's eye image. The instruction step further includes generating the instruction to meet a specification of an API (Application Programming Interface) or an SDK (Software Development Kit) as a software interface.