Fine-Grained API Privilege Elevation for Lower Windows Attack Surface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing Microsoft Windows elevation model provides coarse-grained control over privilege elevation, leading to a broader attack surface and insufficient security as processes are often elevated to full administrator rights without considering the specific security needs of individual operations.

Innovation Solution

A Privilege Manager Agent injects a dynamic library into the AppInfo service to manage Win32 API function calls, allowing for fine-grained control by creating customized access tokens and selectively altering privilege levels for individual threads or blocking function calls based on policy settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If processes are elevated to full administrator rights, then the ability to perform administrative operations is improved, but the attack surface and security risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to perform administrative operationsVSAvoidattack surface and security risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the previously monolithic administrator rights into fine-grained permission sets. Instead of elevating processes to full administrator rights, the system divides administrative capabilities into discrete permissions that can be selectively granted to individual processes based on their specific needs, thereby maintaining necessary functionality while reducing the attack surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by granting different permission levels to different processes based on their specific requirements. Rather than uniformly elevating all processes to full administrator rights, the system tailors permission grants to each process's actual needs, ensuring minimal necessary privileges are assigned locally to each process context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If coarse-grained elevation control is used, then ease of implementation is improved, but security precision and control granularity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidsecurity control granularity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the static, coarse-grained elevation model into a dynamic system where permissions can be selectively granted and revoked based on real-time process behavior and policy evaluation. The system dynamically adjusts permission levels for individual processes rather than using fixed elevation states, enabling fine-grained security control while maintaining implementation feasibility through automated policy enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of permission granularity from coarse (full administrator rights or none) to fine (individual permission bits). By modifying the permission parameter structure to allow selective granting of specific administrative capabilities, the system achieves precise security control without sacrificing ease of implementation, as the underlying mechanism builds upon existing operating system permission infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If all Win32 API function calls are subject to inspection, then security control is improved, but system performance and processing speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity controlVSAvoidsystem performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by inspecting and controlling only those Win32 API function calls that are relevant to administrative operations, rather than uniformly inspecting all function calls. The system selectively applies security evaluation to specific API categories based on their security sensitivity, reducing the overall inspection burden while maintaining security control where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (the permission evaluation mechanism) that sits between application processes and the operating system kernel. This intermediary selectively intercepts and evaluates only the necessary API calls related to administrative operations, allowing normal system operations to proceed without excessive inspection overhead while maintaining security control for critical functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12488083B2Fine-grained elevation and restriction of API function calls
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 DELINEA INC
  • US12488083B2 patent drawing
  • US12488083B2 patent drawing
  • US12488083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for implementing a privilege management agent in an operating system having User Account Control (UAC), the privilege management agent having pre-defined application control policies and an application control service (ACS). The privilege management agent is used to process elevation requests to provide an access token to allow a process running under a user account to run as an elevated process based on the pre-defined process access policies. The method includes intercepting an elevation request from a process having a primary access token provided by the UAC after a user launches a process that requires elevation, tagging the process for possible elevation. The ACS evaluates the tagged process and pre-defined process access policies for a match which corresponds to the elevation request. If found, the ACS applies a customized access token to elevate the process to run with elevated rights, otherwise the process is terminated.