Multi-threaded API Stream Replay for Graphics Debugging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing frame capture systems for graphics applications are inadequate for debugging and performance analysis, particularly when dealing with multi-threaded environments and thread-specific resources, leading to poor replay performance due to the need to set thread-specific state for each function or method execution.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves capturing and replaying function calls in a multi-threaded processor system by establishing a one-to-one relationship between application threads and capture streams, where each thread's state is determined and captured, and the captured function calls are ordered and replayed in the original execution order using corresponding replay threads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single-threaded replay mechanism is used to replay API function calls, then the replay process can be simplified, but the replay performance deteriorates significantly due to the need to set thread-specific state for each function or method execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereplay mechanism complexityVSAvoidreplay performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the replay mechanism into multiple independent replay threads, each responsible for replaying function calls from a specific capture stream. This segmentation allows parallel execution of replay operations, improving performance without requiring complex thread-state management for each individual function call, as each replay thread operates independently with its own associated thread-specific state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by capturing and storing thread-specific state information at the entry point during the capture phase. This pre-captured state is then reused during replay, eliminating the need to set thread-specific state for each function or method execution during replay, thus improving replay performance while keeping the replay mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If thread-specific state is set for each function or method execution during replay, then thread affinity and implicit thread-tied data are handled correctly, but the replay performance becomes very poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread affinity handlingVSAvoidreplay performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the replay process into multiple replay threads, each handling a specific capture stream and its associated thread-specific state. This allows thread affinity to be maintained at the replay thread level rather than requiring state setting for each individual function call, ensuring correct handling of thread-specific data while improving performance through parallel execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates copies of thread-specific state information for each replay thread based on the captured state from the original execution. Each replay thread operates with its own copy of the necessary thread-specific state, allowing correct handling of thread affinity without the overhead of dynamically setting state for each function execution during replay.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If multiple capture streams are established for multiple application threads, then thread-specific resources can be tracked accurately, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread state capture accuracyVSAvoidcapture system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal capture stream structure where each capture stream follows the same format and handling protocol, allowing the system to handle multiple threads uniformly. This multi-functionality approach enables accurate tracking of thread-specific resources through standardized streams while avoiding the complexity of implementing different capture mechanisms for different threads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces capture streams as intermediary structures between application threads and the replay mechanism. These streams serve as mediators that capture and organize thread-specific state and function call information in a standardized format, making the overall system more manageable despite handling multiple threads, as the intermediary layer abstracts the complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9477575B2Method and system for implementing a multi-threaded API stream replay
Publication Date: 2016.10.25 NVIDIA CORP
  • US9477575B2 patent drawing
  • US9477575B2 patent drawing
  • US9477575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for debugging and includes receiving a request for capturing a frame generated by a graphics application implementing application threads executing function calls. The function calls are associated with one or more thread specific resources used at the beginning of the capturing process. For each application thread, a corresponding state is determined for each thread specific resource utilized, and a corresponding capture stream is established. For each application thread, executed function calls are captured into the corresponding capture stream. A plurality of captured function calls is arranged in the order they were executed by the graphics application. For each capture stream, a corresponding replay thread is established. Application threads, capture streams, and replay threads exist in a one-to-one-to-one relationship. Captured function calls are replayed in order, wherein each captured function call is executed in a corresponding replay thread based on which application thread executed the captured function call.