API Traffic-Based Security Testing for Unique Web Service Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security systems struggle to effectively and efficiently test Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) for security vulnerabilities due to their uniqueness and the difficulty in configuring automated tests for each API, compounded by the increasing number of APIs in modern web service environments.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that monitor API traffic to generate contextual information, automatically create API tests based on this information, execute these tests to detect vulnerabilities, and export results, utilizing a security server to identify and address security vulnerabilities before deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If automated API testing is implemented, then security vulnerability detection capability is improved, but device complexity increases due to the need to configure and maintain separate tests for each unique API

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity vulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses API specifications (such as OpenAPI/Swagger specs) as templates or blueprints to automatically generate test cases. Instead of manually configuring tests for each API, the system copies the structure and parameters defined in the API specification to create corresponding test scenarios, thereby reducing the complexity of test configuration while maintaining comprehensive security testing coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system automatically generates test cases, executes them, and produces reports without requiring manual intervention for each API. The system self-configures by reading API specifications and autonomously creates appropriate security tests, eliminating the need for continuous human configuration and reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual API testing configuration is performed for each API, then testing accuracy is improved, but productivity decreases due to the time-consuming nature of configuring each test individually

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidAPI testing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

API specifications are prepared in advance during the API design phase, containing all necessary information about endpoints, parameters, data types, and expected behaviors. This preliminary documentation enables the testing system to automatically generate accurate test cases without manual configuration, maintaining testing precision while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A single API specification serves multiple purposes: it defines the API contract for developers, documents the interface for stakeholders, and simultaneously acts as the basis for automatic test case generation. This multi-functionality eliminates redundant work and enables high-volume API testing with consistent accuracy across all APIs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If comprehensive security testing is performed on all APIs, then security coverage is improved, but loss of time increases due to the large number of APIs requiring testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system prioritizes security testing based on risk assessment, focusing first on critical endpoints and high-value targets. By applying partial action to the most important APIs and using automated generation to handle the remainder, the system achieves comprehensive coverage without proportionally increasing testing time, as the automated generation process handles volume efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12596810B2Automated application programming interface (API) testing
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 CEQUENCE SECURITY INC
  • US12596810B2 patent drawing
  • US12596810B2 patent drawing
  • US12596810B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments facilitate Application Programming Interface (APIs) testing. In some examples, an apparatus detects security vulnerabilities in an API. The apparatus comprises one or more computer-readable storage media, a processing system operatively coupled with the one or more computer-readable storage media, and program instructions stored on the one or more computer-readable storage media. When executed by the processing system, the program instructions direct the processing system to perform operations. The apparatus monitors API traffic and responsively generates contextual information that characterizes the operations of the API. The apparatus generates an API test based on the contextual information to detect the security vulnerabilities in the API. The apparatus executes the API test on the API. The apparatus generates test results that indicate detected security vulnerabilities in the API. The processing system exports the test results.