API Validation Service for Web Application Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems require manual scripting and multiple tools for testing and validation of web applications, especially when dealing with API call chains, and often fail to identify the root cause of errors or failures.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for programmatic validation of web applications using API chaining, which generates a testing scenario, measures performance metrics, analyzes activity logs to identify failures, and provides outputs with identified problems, along with options for scheduling endpoint monitoring and alert configurations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual scripting and multiple separate tools are used for testing and validation, then developers can perform testing of web applications and service endpoints, but the process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidtesting process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate testing tools and manual scripting processes into a single automated validation service. The system integrates endpoint validation, API call chain testing, and error analysis into one unified platform that automatically performs comprehensive validation without requiring developers to manually coordinate multiple tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The validation service performs multiple functions through a single system: it validates service endpoints, tests API call chains, analyzes error logs, identifies root causes, and provides comprehensive validation reports. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate specialized tools for each testing aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing and validation of API call chains is performed, then validation accuracy improves, but the time required for testing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by automatically executing test scenarios against service endpoints before deployment. It proactively identifies potential issues in API call chains through pre-configured validation rules and patterns, allowing developers to catch errors early in the development cycle rather than during later testing phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical testing processes with automated computational validation. The system uses algorithmic approaches to automatically execute test scenarios, analyze response patterns, and identify errors in API call chains, eliminating the time-consuming manual execution and analysis that would otherwise be required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated programmatic validation is implemented, then testing efficiency improves, but the initial setup and configuration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation service automatically configures itself by detecting service endpoints and generating appropriate test scenarios without requiring extensive manual setup. The system self-adapts to the application's API structure by analyzing endpoint definitions and automatically creating validation rules, reducing the configuration burden on developers while maintaining high automation levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If root cause analysis of API call chain errors is performed, then error identification accuracy improves, but the complexity of error analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror identification accuracyVSAvoiderror analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the error analysis process by breaking down API call chains into individual components and analyzing each segment separately. When an error occurs, the validation service isolates the specific failing component within the call chain and provides targeted analysis of that segment, making complex error analysis manageable through systematic decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10901880B1API monitoring and validation for onboarded applications
Publication Date: 2021.01.26 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US10901880B1 patent drawing
  • US10901880B1 patent drawing
  • US10901880B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An API monitoring and validation tool that may be provided as part of a web-based application testing and deployment environment. The environment may enable developers to develop web-based applications, validate and test APIs used by the applications and deploy the applications. The API monitoring and validation tool may perform validation of a service endpoint used by an application. As part of the validation, a user may provide information regarding the form and content of a successful response to a call to the service endpoint is. The monitoring may measure performance metrics and obtain information regarding the causes of errors and failures. The monitoring can identify errors and failures that occur during API call chains to service endpoints.