Application Performance Framework Using Knowledge Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tools for analyzing application performance are inefficient in detecting bottlenecks and hotspots in complex and dynamic environments, requiring manual scripting and lacking real-time observability and proactive scaling solutions.

Innovation Solution

A comprehensive application performance framework that employs automated processes for benchmarking, full-stack observability, and knowledge graphs to detect bottlenecks and hotspots, providing real-time monitoring and dynamic scaling capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual benchmarking scripting is used, then developers can analyze application performance, but it requires significant time and effort to write and update scripts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebenchmarking efficiencyVSAvoidtime for writing and updating benchmarking scripts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automated benchmarking execution. The benchmarking module automatically executes benchmarking scenarios without requiring developers to manually write or update scripts, eliminating the time-consuming manual scripting process while maintaining comprehensive performance analysis capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-configuring benchmarking scenarios and automatically preparing test environments before actual benchmarking runs. This includes setting up workload configurations, selecting appropriate metrics, and preparing the application environment in advance, so that when benchmarking is triggered, it executes immediately without requiring manual script preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If traditional monitoring tools are used, then basic performance metrics can be collected, but they cannot effectively detect causal relationships in complex and highly dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of performance issuesVSAvoidcomplexity of analysis in dynamic environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where performance metrics are constantly collected, analyzed, and used to adjust monitoring strategies. The feedback mechanism tracks causal relationships between different metrics over time, enabling the system to identify root causes of performance issues in complex environments by analyzing how changes in one component propagate through the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds another dimension to traditional monitoring by incorporating temporal analysis and causal relationship tracking. Instead of just collecting static metrics, the system analyzes metric relationships across time dimensions and identifies causal chains, transforming basic metric collection into intelligent performance diagnosis capable of handling complex dynamic environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If developers manually analyze performance metrics, then they can identify bottlenecks, but it is difficult to keep up with changes in complex and highly dynamic application environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of bottleneck detectionVSAvoidspeed of bottleneck detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical manual analysis process with automated computational analysis. Instead of developers manually examining metrics and identifying bottlenecks, the system uses automated algorithms to continuously analyze performance data, detect bottlenecks, and alert developers, thereby maintaining consistent detection reliability while dramatically improving detection speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system ensures continuous useful action by implementing ongoing automated monitoring and analysis of performance metrics. Rather than periodic manual checks, the system continuously collects, analyzes, and interprets performance data in real-time, ensuring that bottlenecks are detected promptly and consistently without requiring developer intervention, thus maintaining both reliability and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive benchmarking is performed, then accurate performance assessment is achieved, but it requires sophisticated execution scripts that need frequent updates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of performance assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of benchmarking execution scripts
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically configuring and executing comprehensive benchmarking scenarios without requiring sophisticated manual scripts. The benchmarking module autonomously selects appropriate test cases, configures workloads, executes benchmarks, and generates performance assessments, thereby maintaining measurement precision while eliminating the complexity of script management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements universality through a unified benchmarking framework that handles multiple types of performance assessments through a single automated interface. This multi-functional system can execute various benchmarking scenarios (load testing, stress testing, scalability testing) without requiring separate sophisticated scripts for each type, thereby achieving accurate performance assessment across diverse scenarios while reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11709758B2Enhanced application performance framework
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US11709758B2 patent drawing
  • US11709758B2 patent drawing
  • US11709758B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This document describes a framework for measuring and improving the performance of applications, such as distributed applications and web applications. In one aspect, a method includes performing a test on an application. The test includes executing the application on one or more computers and, while executing the application, simulating a set of workload scenarios for which performance of the application is measured during the test. While performing the test, a set of performance metrics that indicate performance of individual components involved in executing the application during the test is obtained. A knowledge graph is queried using the set of performance metrics. The knowledge graph links the individual components to corresponding performance metrics and defines a set of hotspot conditions that are each based on one or more of the corresponding performance metrics for the individual components. A given hotspot condition is detected based on the set of performance metrics.