Apparel Design Extrapolation Preserving Aspect Ratio

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating custom designs on apparel fail to maintain the aspect ratio and integrity of full-bleed designs across varying sizes and product types, requiring manual redesign for each size due to significant horizontal growth and curvature variations.

Innovation Solution

The method employs specific scaling and translation formulas to automate design extrapolation across different sizes and product types, preserving the aspect ratio and adjusting elements to fit new patterns, utilizing formulas like [Sx=max (dX, dY), Sy=max (dX, dY), Tx=cX, Ty=cY] for scaling up and [Sx=min (dX, dY), Sy=min (dX, dY), Tx=cX, Ty=cY] for scaling down, and individual modifications for each design element.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If direct scaling of image is used to adapt design to different sizes, then the design can be applied to various sizes, but the aspect ratio is lost and the image looks distorted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign adaptability across sizesVSAvoidaspect ratio preservation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The design image is segmented into multiple pattern pieces corresponding to different apparel sizes. Each pattern piece is individually mapped and transformed based on its specific geometric characteristics, allowing the design to adapt to size variations while preserving the aspect ratio and visual integrity of each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If manual design creation is performed for each size, then the aspect ratio and design integrity are maintained, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign integrityVSAvoiddesign creation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates automated copies of the original design across multiple size variants. By establishing a mapping relationship between the source design and target pattern pieces, the system generates size-specific designs through automated transformation rather than manual recreation, significantly reducing time while maintaining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the design by changing geometric parameters (scaling factors, translation vectors, rotation angles) based on the target size requirements. These parameter adjustments are calculated automatically to preserve aspect ratios and ensure proper fit across different apparel sizes without requiring manual redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform scaling is applied to the design, then the application process is simplified, but the design elements may be cut off or distorted due to varying curvature across sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign application simplicityVSAvoiddesign element completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying uniform scaling to the entire design, the system applies local quality transformations to different regions. Each pattern piece receives customized transformation parameters (scaling, translation, rotation) tailored to its specific geometric properties and curvature characteristics, ensuring that design elements remain complete and undistorted across varying sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9406172B2Method for automatic extrapolation of designs across apparel and accessory sizes and types
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 VPERSONALIZE INC
  • US9406172B2 patent drawing
  • US9406172B2 patent drawing
  • US9406172B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for modifying the dimensions of a design pattern embedded on a garment is disclosed. Original dimensions of the apparel and new dimensions according to which the apparel is to be modified are determined. A coordinate pair indicating the center point of the design pattern is determined. Two delta factors, one corresponding to height and the other corresponding to the width are determined. The delta factors indicate the difference, in terms of height and width respectively, between the original dimensions of the garment, and the dimensions to which the garment is purported to be modified. Subsequently, one of the delta factors is selected depending upon the nature of modification, and provided as an input to an affine transformation operation, along with the coordinate pair. The dimensions of the design pattern are modified based on the affine transformation operation and the selected delta factor and coordinate pair.