Appliance Controller Automating Demand Response via Utility Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current energy management systems require manual operation of appliances during off-peak hours to reduce electricity costs, which is inconvenient and lacks advanced control beyond simple on/off switching, and different utilities use varying methods to communicate peak demand times.

Innovation Solution

A home energy management system with an appliance controller that receives signals from the utility, processes demand response threshold variables, and operates appliances in reduced energy consumption modes based on user inputs and sensor data, offering flexible control and communication protocols to manage energy usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If manual operation of appliances during off-peak hours is required, then energy consumption costs are reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumption costVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The appliance controller automatically monitors utility signals, determines peak and off-peak periods, and operates appliances without requiring manual user intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously making decisions about when to operate power-consuming functions based on utility pricing signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operation with an automated electronic control system that receives utility signals, processes threshold variables, and automatically controls appliance operation timing and mode selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If simple on/off switching is used for appliance control, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts appliance operation based on real-time utility signals and threshold variables. Instead of fixed on/off switching, the system continuously adapts its control strategy by comparing current conditions against demand response thresholds and adjusting power-consuming functions accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as power consumption levels, operating modes, and timing based on utility signals. The controller modifies appliance behavior by adjusting multiple parameters rather than simply switching on/off, enabling flexible adaptation to different utility pricing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple communication methods are supported, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The appliance controller is designed with universal communication capabilities that can receive utility signals through multiple methods (phone lines, wireless signals, power line communication). A single controller unit performs multiple communication functions, eliminating the need for separate dedicated hardware for each communication method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that can interface with different utility communication systems through standardized protocols. It translates various utility signal formats into internal threshold variable comparisons, mediating between diverse external communication methods and the appliance's control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If automatic operation during off-peak hours is implemented, then productivity improves, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidloss of information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors utility signals and receives feedback about current pricing conditions and demand response threshold variables. This feedback loop enables the system to make informed automatic decisions by comparing real-time utility information against predefined thresholds and user preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring demand response threshold variables and user preferences before utility signals arrive. The controller is prepared in advance with decision-making parameters, enabling it to automatically respond to utility signals without requiring real-time user input or information retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8369998B2Updating demand response settings
Publication Date: 2013.02.05 HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8369998B2 patent drawing
  • US8369998B2 patent drawing
  • US8369998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An appliance controller is provided comprising an appliance including demand response settings. The settings include threshold variables for determining a reaction of the appliance in response to reaching one or more threshold variables. The controller further comprises a signal from an associated utility to the appliance, wherein the appliance includes a controller in signal communication with the associated utility. The controller receives and processes the signal from the associated utility. The signal is converted and compared to the demand response threshold variables and the appliance is operated in one or more power consuming functions based on the comparison of the signal to the demand response variables.