Home Appliance Scheduling With Environmental Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Home appliances often fail to operate in a desired state even when scheduled, leading to issues like excessive energy waste, unnecessary damage, and poor indoor air quality due to inaccurate predictions of outdoor environments.

Innovation Solution

An information processing system for home appliances that includes a terminal, an individual service area, and an information processing apparatus connected through a network. This system identifies user needs and provides corresponding application services, optimizing the operation of home appliances based on environmental information and user behavior.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If home appliances operate based on scheduled reservations, then user convenience is improved, but operation accuracy in desired state deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidoperation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors indoor environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, air quality) and compares them against target values to dynamically adjust appliance operations. This feedback mechanism ensures that scheduled operations achieve desired states by making real-time corrections based on actual environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary environmental assessments before executing scheduled operations and makes pre-adjustments to appliance settings based on predicted conditions. This allows the system to proactively prepare for scheduled operations, ensuring they start in optimal conditions and reach desired states more accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If home appliances operate based on inaccurate outdoor environment predictions, then scheduled operations are executed, but energy waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduled operation executionVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time indoor environmental feedback to verify whether scheduled operations are actually needed. If indoor conditions already meet comfort criteria, the system cancels or modifies scheduled operations, preventing unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining productivity when operations are genuinely required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts scheduled operations based on current environmental conditions, transitioning from static pre-programmed schedules to flexible adaptive scheduling. This allows the system to optimize energy usage by modifying or canceling operations when conditions change, while maintaining operational productivity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If air purifier operates continuously to improve air quality, then indoor air purification is enhanced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindoor air qualityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic air quality monitoring and adjusts air purifier operation accordingly, switching between active purification, standby, and shutdown states based on real-time air quality measurements. This periodic operation maintains air quality within acceptable ranges while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters of the air purifier (speed, power level, on/off state) based on measured air quality parameters. When air quality is good, the purifier operates at lower power or shuts down; when air quality deteriorates, the system increases purification intensity, optimizing the balance between air quality maintenance and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple home appliances operate independently according to schedules, then individual appliance functionality is maintained, but coordinated operation for optimal performance is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual appliance functionalityVSAvoidcoordinated operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual appliance schedules into a unified coordinated schedule by analyzing interactions between appliances. It combines temperature control, humidity control, and air quality management operations into synchronized sequences that achieve optimal environmental conditions more efficiently than independent operations, while maintaining the functional independence of each appliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250147487A1Information processing method, processing system, and processing apparatus for a home appliance
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • US20250147487A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147487A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147487A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing system for a home appliance according to the present invention may include: at least one home appliance; a terminal configured to process information of the at least one home appliance; an individual service area configured to provide an individual service; and an information processing apparatus connected to the terminal and the at least one home appliance through a network and configured to provide an application service using the individual service. The system may identify user needs for the individual service and provide a corresponding application service.