Application System Control via Segmented Modification Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing application systems for coating workpieces face challenges in efficiently managing different working modes and maintaining system operation during non-working phases, particularly in preventing line clogging and optimizing settings for various application materials.

Innovation Solution

A device with controllable modification units that can set and maintain predetermined working modes through digital control signals, allowing for centralized control and easy reprogramming, along with integrated sensors and actuators for real-time parameter adjustment, enabling flexible operation and optimal settings determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a central control coordinates all modification units, then system-wide working modes can be managed, but the control structure becomes complex and reprogramming becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking mode managementVSAvoidcontrol structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into autonomous modification units, each capable of independent control. Instead of one central controller managing all units, each modification unit has its own control logic and can be programmed independently to set and maintain specific working modes, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each modification unit is designed to be self-sufficient with integrated sensors and actuators that allow it to autonomously detect its own state and adjust its parameters without requiring constant central coordination. This self-service capability simplifies the control structure by eliminating the need for complex centralized management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of manufacture

If modification units are controlled individually, then reprogramming becomes easier, but coordination between units becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereprogramming easeVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal communication protocol and standardized interface that all modification units use to interact with each other and with the central control. This allows individual units to be programmed independently while maintaining seamless coordination through a common language, solving both the reprogramming ease and coordination complexity issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the system maintains high pressure during non-working phases, then material flow is ready for immediate operation, but energy consumption increases and line clogging risk remains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereadiness for operationVSAvoidenergy consumption during breaks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic pressure control where the system automatically adjusts pressure levels based on operational state. During working phases, high pressure is maintained for immediate material flow; during non-working phases, pressure is automatically reduced to conserve energy and minimize clogging risk, while still maintaining operational readiness through intelligent control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters (pressure, flow rate) based on the working phase. During breaks, pressure and flow parameters are reduced from high operational levels to lower maintenance levels, thereby reducing energy consumption and clogging risk while maintaining the capability to quickly resume operation when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If the system uses multiple working modes, then it can handle different application materials and conditions, but determining optimal settings becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling different materialsVSAvoidoptimization difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates sensors in each modification unit that continuously monitor operational parameters and material properties. This feedback is used by the control system to automatically adjust settings and determine optimal parameters for different application materials and conditions, simplifying the optimization process while maintaining high adaptability across multiple working modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3041614B1Device for supplying an application material
Publication Date: 2022.10.05 BM SURFACE SYST
  • EP3041614B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3041614B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An application system for viscous or pasty media comprises a conveyor unit (22) which suctions application material from a storage container (20) and feeds the application material under high pressure to an application unit (10). The conveyor unit and modification circuits (32, 34, 46, 38, 40, 42) inserted in the lines through which application material flows are each provided with local controllable closed-loop control units (*) that receive only set values for a mode of operation from a central open-loop control unit (62).