Application Usage Score for Dynamic Software Licensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software and hardware resource management systems lack transparency and granularity in assessing usage, leading to inefficient licensing and high costs for businesses, as they often pay for unused resources without clear understanding of the business value conferred.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that calculates an Application Usage Score (AUS) based on actual business value, which considers various characteristics and weights across different tiers of a computer system, allowing for more accurate billing and resource optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If Per CPU License or Per User License models are used, then software vendors can generate regular revenue, but enterprises pay for unused resources without clear understanding of actual business value

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewasted software licensing costsVSAvoidlack of transparency in application usage and business value
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous monitoring and feedback loops that track application usage metrics, resource consumption, and business value indicators. This feedback mechanism provides enterprises with real-time visibility into actual software utilization, enabling data-driven licensing decisions and eliminating payments for unused resources while maintaining vendor revenue streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary assessment system that acts as a mediator between software vendors and enterprises. This intermediary layer objectively measures and quantifies application usage and business value, translating complex technical metrics into understandable business indicators that both parties can use for transparent licensing negotiations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If enterprises maintain costly hardware and software licenses, then application availability is ensured, but actual usage and business value remain difficult or impossible to quantify

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication availabilityVSAvoidprecision in measuring application usage and business value
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces subjective, qualitative assessments of application value with objective, quantitative measurement mechanisms. By substituting mechanical monitoring tools and automated data collection systems for human judgment, the patent achieves precise measurement of usage metrics and business value with high reliability and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms abstract concepts like 'business value' and 'application usage' into measurable parameters and indicators. By defining specific metrics, thresholds, and measurement protocols, the system enables precise quantification of previously intangible attributes while maintaining application availability through continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If enterprises purchase software licenses based on CPU count or user count, then licensing is simplified, but resource optimization and cost reduction opportunities are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of licensing processVSAvoidresource optimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static licensing models (fixed CPU or user counts) to dynamic licensing that automatically adjusts based on real-time usage patterns and business value metrics. This dynamic approach maintains operational simplicity through automated decision-making while significantly improving resource optimization efficiency by allocating licenses based on actual needs rather than fixed allocations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9009289B1Systems and methods for assessing application usage
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 FLEXERA SOFTWARE LLC
  • US9009289B1 patent drawing
  • US9009289B1 patent drawing
  • US9009289B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various of the disclosed embodiments disclose systems and methods for assessing usage of a resource, such as hardware, software, or firmware, in a computer system. For example, some embodiments contemplate a model in which an enterprise application derives its license cost based upon the actual business value provided by the licensed resource to the enterprise. If an enterprise has purchased software that it uses very heavily, then the license cost may increase. Conversely, if the enterprise uses the software rarely, then the license cost may decrease. This usage granularity may allow an enterprise executive to purchase a software license without fear that the software will be inefficiently utilized. A licensor may similarly use the system to charge more accurate fees.