Applicator with Frustoconical Cannula for Delicate Implant Insertion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing applicators for inserting rod-like implants under the skin often damage delicate implants due to closures like bolts, O-rings, and crimp regions within the cannula, which can cause mechanical stress during insertion and expulsion.

Innovation Solution

A mechanism that secures the implant inside the cannula upon cover removal and disengages it prior to expulsion, using a rotatable, slidable, or flexible lever to minimize force exerted on the implant, preventing lateral movement and ensuring gentle handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If closures like bolts, O-rings, or crimp regions are used inside the cannula to secure the implant, then the implant is secured during storage and insertion, but the implant may be damaged due to mechanical stress from these closures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring of implantVSAvoidmechanical damage to implant
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the closure elements (bolts, O-rings, crimp regions) from inside the cannula lumen. Instead, the cannula is designed with a frustoconical outer shape that provides mechanical engagement with the implant externally, eliminating the need for internal closures that could damage delicate implants during insertion and expulsion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using internal closures to secure the implant, the invention inverts the approach by using the external frustoconical shape of the cannula to engage and secure the implant. The securing mechanism is moved from the interior to the exterior of the cannula, avoiding contact between closure elements and the implant surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If a mechanism secures the implant inside the cannula upon cover removal, then the implant is protected during storage, but the mechanism may exert force on the implant during expulsion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection during storageVSAvoidforce exerted on implant
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The invention eliminates the need for a separate securing mechanism that could exert force during expulsion. The frustoconical cannula design provides passive securing through its shape alone, and the expulsion process relies on pressure differential without requiring the mechanism to actively push or pull the implant, thereby minimizing force exertion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The frustoconical shape creates a dynamic engagement where the implant is passively held during storage through geometric interference, and during expulsion, the same geometry allows smooth passage when pressure is applied, adapting the interaction between cannula and implant based on the operational phase without requiring active mechanism engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9757552B2Applicator for inserting an implant
Publication Date: 2017.09.12 MERCK SHARP & DOHME BV
  • US9757552B2 patent drawing
  • US9757552B2 patent drawing
  • US9757552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention pertains to an applicator (1) for inserting an implant, in particular a rod-like implant (2) containing an active substance, under the skin of a human or animal, comprising a housing (3), a cannula (6), a cannula holder (9), an implant (2) accommodated inside the cannula (6) and/or the cannula holder (9), a protective cover (7) for the cannula (6), and a mechanism (22, 23, 7) which, at least after the cover (7) has been removed from the cannula (6), secures the implant (2) inside the cannula (6) and/or cannula holder (9). The mechanism (22, 23, 7) disengages the implant (2) during insertion of the cannula (6) or after the cannula (6) has been inserted. Substantially no lateral force will be exerted during the expelling of the implant from the cannula.