Cosmetic Applicator Surface Roughness for Release and Hygiene

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cosmetic applicators accumulate cosmetic material on their surface, reducing the amount available for application and leading to bacterial growth, and require multiple applicators for different types of cosmetics, resulting in hygiene issues and a bulky kit.

Innovation Solution

A cosmetic applicator with a surface layer having an arithmetic average surface roughness of 10 µm or less and a maximum height of 100 µm or less, achieved through processing or using a sheet-like material with specified roughness, to prevent material accumulation and ensure reliable release.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a normal tip with embossed patterns or porous irregularity is used, then cosmetic material can be held on the surface, but the material enters the concaved parts and prevents favorable release onto the skin surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecosmetic material holding capacityVSAvoidcosmetic material release performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the surface roughness parameters by limiting the arithmetic average surface roughness Ra to 10 µm or less and the maximum height Rz to 100 µm or less. This parameter optimization ensures that the surface can hold sufficient cosmetic material while preventing material from entering deep concaved parts, thereby enabling favorable release onto the skin surface during makeup application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If cosmetic material is allowed to accumulate on the application face, then the surface can hold more material, but the amount of cosmetic material that can be picked up and released is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecosmetic material storage on surfaceVSAvoidcosmetic material application efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By optimizing the surface roughness parameters (Ra ≤ 10 µm, Rz ≤ 100 µm), the invention creates a surface that holds an appropriate amount of cosmetic material without excessive accumulation. This ensures that sufficient material is available for pickup while maintaining high release efficiency, thereby improving overall application productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If one cosmetic applicator is used for cosmetic materials of different types and colors, then the kit size is reduced, but different cosmetic materials mix and rise to the surface causing unwanted mixture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of applicators requiredVSAvoidcosmetic material contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controlled surface roughness parameters (Ra ≤ 10 µm, Rz ≤ 100 µm) create a surface that does not deeply absorb or retain cosmetic materials. This prevents previous cosmetic materials from remaining on the surface and mixing with subsequent applications, thereby eliminating contamination issues while allowing single applicator use for multiple cosmetic types and colors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The surface properties of the applicator are designed to prevent material retention, effectively creating a 'clean slate' after each use. This allows the applicator to function as if renewed after each application, preventing cross-contamination between different cosmetic products without requiring multiple dedicated applicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Quantity of substance

If liquid cosmetic material permeates into the applicator, then the applicator can hold material, but bacteria grow easily inside the applicator

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecosmetic material absorption capacityVSAvoidbacterial growth risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By limiting the surface roughness parameters (Ra ≤ 10 µm, Rz ≤ 100 µm), the invention reduces the depth and volume of surface irregularities where liquid cosmetic material can permeate and accumulate. This minimizes the environment available for bacterial growth while still allowing sufficient material holding capacity for effective makeup application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2823727B1Cosmetics applicator
Publication Date: 2017.06.07 KK TAIKI

AI summary

A cosmetic applicator whose application part has an arithmetic average surface roughness Ra of 10 µm or less is provided, based on a study of the surface roughness of the application part of the cosmetic applicator, to further reduce the amount of cosmetic material accumulating on the surface of the application part, and to more reliably release onto the skin surface the cosmetic material that has been picked up onto the surface of the application part.