Appointment Duration Prediction for Provider-Specific Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing scheduling systems struggle to accurately determine appointment durations based on the activities involved, leading to inefficiencies and inaccuracies in scheduling processes.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that analyzes historical data to predict appointment durations by considering the activities, timing, and provider attributes, and iteratively updates the model using actual appointment data to improve accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional scheduling systems use fixed or manual methods to determine appointment durations, then the scheduling process is simple to implement, but the accuracy and efficiency of appointment duration determination deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveappointment duration accuracyVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual or rule-based scheduling methods with an artificial intelligence system that uses machine learning models to automatically determine appointment durations. The AI system analyzes historical data, activity types, and provider characteristics to predict optimal durations, substituting mechanical decision-making processes with intelligent algorithms that continuously learn and improve accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The scheduling system performs self-optimization by automatically collecting data from actual appointments and using this information to train and refine its machine learning models. The system autonomously improves its duration prediction accuracy over time without requiring external intervention, continuously adapting to new patterns and provider-specific characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If scheduling systems use standardized appointment durations for all providers, then the system is easy to operate, but the adaptability to individual provider needs and activity variations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprovider-specific customizationVSAvoidscheduling system operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements provider-specific customization by training separate machine learning models for each healthcare provider based on their individual historical appointment data. Each model learns the unique patterns, activity types, and time requirements specific to that provider, enabling highly adapted duration recommendations rather than applying uniform standards across all providers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts appointment duration recommendations based on real-time factors including the specific activities scheduled, provider characteristics, and historical performance data. The machine learning models continuously update their predictions based on actual appointment outcomes, making the system flexible and responsive to changing conditions rather than relying on static, pre-defined duration tables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If scheduling systems collect and analyze extensive historical data to improve duration predictions, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and model training in advance by continuously learning from historical appointment data as it becomes available. The machine learning models are trained incrementally on accumulated data, so when predictions are needed, the system already has pre-processed patterns and insights ready, reducing the computational burden at the moment of prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses historical appointment data as training examples to create simplified representations of optimal duration patterns. The machine learning models capture essential relationships from extensive historical data and store them as learned parameters, allowing the system to make accurate predictions using compact model structures rather than re-processing raw historical data for each prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20260073360A1Machine-Based Selection or Modification of an Appointment Duration
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US20260073360A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073360A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073360A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques are disclosed that determine time allotments for appointments based on activities to be performed. A system determines a time allotment for an appointment by applying a machine learning model trained to calculate a duration for performing a set of activities involved in the appointment. The machine learning model may calculate the duration based on the set of activities, the timing of the appointment, and attributes of the provider.