Appointment Optimization Engine for Delivery Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current logistics systems for scheduled deliveries are inefficient, with wide delivery windows and poor route planning leading to frustrated customers, increased theft and damage of packages, and logistical challenges, particularly in providing reliable and pinpoint accurate delivery times and dates.

Innovation Solution

A delivery scheduling system utilizing a central functionality hub with a route optimization algorithm, geolocation server, routing server, external communication user interface, and API to generate efficient delivery routes and schedules based on customer input, allowing for negotiation and confirmation of narrow delivery windows, and integrating appointment and transportation scheduling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If standard service provider scheduling is used with wide delivery windows, then service coverage is broad, but delivery time precision is poor and customers experience frustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery time precisionVSAvoidservice coverage flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts delivery time windows based on real-time route optimization calculations. Instead of using fixed wide windows, the algorithm continuously refines delivery schedules as vehicles complete deliveries and new routes are calculated, allowing precision to improve over time while maintaining adaptability to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary route optimization calculations before deliveries begin, establishing initial precise time windows. This advance planning allows the system to commit to specific delivery times while still maintaining flexibility to adjust for unexpected changes during execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If dispatchers make on-the-fly decisions using spreadsheets, then operational flexibility is maintained, but route efficiency is poor and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual spreadsheet-based dispatching with an automated algorithmic optimization engine. The software automatically calculates optimal routes and schedules based on multiple variables, eliminating the need for manual spreadsheet manipulation while significantly improving delivery efficiency and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The optimization system serves itself by automatically generating and updating routes without requiring manual dispatcher intervention. The algorithm continuously processes delivery data, calculates optimal paths, and adjusts schedules autonomously, freeing dispatchers from complex routing decisions while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If large items are delivered with poor route planning, then delivery capacity is utilized, but logistical problems cause late or missed deliveries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery reliabilityVSAvoidlogistical coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary route optimization that specifically accounts for large item deliveries, calculating sequences that maximize vehicle capacity utilization while ensuring timely arrivals. Routes are pre-calculated to accommodate the specific constraints of bulky items before deliveries begin

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts delivery sequences for large items based on real-time conditions. As vehicles complete deliveries and return for additional loads, the algorithm recalculates optimal routes to maintain reliability while adapting to changing logistical conditions and capacity availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If customers are contacted for delivery time selection, then customer preference is accommodated, but negotiation time increases operational complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer convenienceVSAvoidnegotiation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system contacts customers in advance with pre-calculated optimal delivery time windows based on route optimization. Customers receive specific time options rather than open-ended negotiations, allowing them to select preferred times while the system maintains its efficiency calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback loop where customer time preferences are collected and fed back into the optimization algorithm. The algorithm then adjusts routes and schedules to accommodate these preferences while maintaining overall efficiency, creating a collaborative scheduling process that reduces back-and-forth negotiation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11741436B2Appointment optimization engine
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 SHURPA INC
  • US11741436B2 patent drawing
  • US11741436B2 patent drawing
  • US11741436B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An all-encompassing system for planning and optimizing scheduled delivery appointments (or attended deliveries) through the utilization of a software tool having two major constituents: an asynchronously operating background advanced, genetic route optimization algorithm and an algorithm-informed communication user interface (whether through digital, or even analog, pathways, such as, without limitation, SMS, email, IM, and the like, oral communications, or any other possible means of communication). Such a system employs the optimization algorithm to determine efficient routes for delivery services in response to selections from contacted customers via the communication user interface. In this manner, the system allows for an initial base route generation from a set population of responding customers and negotiation through the communication user interface for a delivery time in relation to such a route. Subsequent responses are introduced in relation to the route in efficient manner by the algorithm as well.