Approval Request Screen for Multi-User Settings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current information processing systems lack a robust mechanism for multi-user authentication and approval processes, particularly in scenarios where settings changes on an information processing apparatus require approval from another user, leading to potential conflicts and inconsistencies in settings.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and system that includes an instructing unit to display an approval request screen, a response obtaining unit to collect user responses, and an execution unit to execute setting changes based on the obtained responses, ensuring that multiple users are authenticated and settings changes are approved or rejected accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If settings changing processing is allowed without approval mechanism, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential conflicts and inconsistencies in settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of settings changeVSAvoidsettings consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication of users before allowing settings changes. The authenticating unit verifies user identities in advance, and only authenticated users can initiate or approve settings changes, preventing unauthorized modifications while maintaining operational ease for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the approval request screen displays to the second user, who then provides feedback by approving or rejecting the settings change. This feedback loop ensures that settings changes are only finalized when approved, maintaining consistency and reliability while still allowing efficient operation through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multi-user authentication and approval process is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettings consistencyVSAvoidauthentication and approval mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authenticating unit serves multiple functions: it authenticates the first user who initiates settings changes, authenticates the second user who approves changes, and manages the approval workflow. This multi-functional design reduces overall system complexity by consolidating authentication and approval management into a single integrated unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service authentication and approval workflows where users independently authenticate and make approval decisions without requiring additional administrative intervention. The approval request screen automatically presents to the second user, who can approve or reject settings changes autonomously, reducing operational complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If approval request screen is displayed to second user, then reliability is improved by preventing unauthorized changes, but loss of time increases due to approval process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesettings securityVSAvoidapproval processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual authentication and approval processes with automated electronic mechanisms. The authenticating unit automatically verifies user identities, and the approval request screen automatically presents to the second user for digital approval or rejection. This automation eliminates time-consuming manual verification while maintaining security and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state parameters of the settings changing processing to include authentication status and approval status. By tracking these parameters, the system can rapidly determine whether settings changes should be executed, approved, or rejected, reducing processing time while maintaining reliability through structured parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11032445B2Information processing apparatus and system and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US11032445B2 patent drawing
  • US11032445B2 patent drawing
  • US11032445B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes an instructing unit, a response obtaining unit, and an execution unit. The instructing unit provides an instruction to display an approval request screen to a terminal apparatus operated by a second user. The approval request screen is used for making a request to approve execution of setting changing processing for changing a setting of the information processing apparatus operated by a first user. The first and second users are authenticated by an authenticating unit. The response obtaining unit obtains a response made on the approval request screen from the second user. The execution unit executes the setting changing processing in accordance with the response obtained by the response obtaining unit.