APU Emergency Power via Independent Hydrogen Fuel Circuit

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft auxiliary power units (APU) and ram air turbines (RAT) impose unnecessary in-flight loads and suffer from severe maintenance constraints, limiting their effectiveness as power sources during standard flight conditions and emergency situations.

Innovation Solution

The APU is repurposed to provide emergency power by using a specific, independent fuel supply of hydrogen, which is stored in a stable form and can be instantaneously converted for combustion, eliminating the need for the RAT and reducing maintenance burdens.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the APU is used as a non-propulsive energy source during flight, then additional power is provided to aircraft systems, but the APU represents an unnecessary in-flight load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenon-propulsive powerVSAvoidin-flight load
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The APU is designed to perform multiple functions: it serves as both a source of non-propulsive power during normal flight operations and as an emergency power source for vital systems. This multi-functionality allows the APU to provide power benefits while being integrated into the aircraft's existing power architecture, reducing the need for separate dedicated emergency power equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the RAT is installed to meet emergency power requirements, then emergency power is provided to vital systems, but the equipment imposes severe maintenance constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency power supplyVSAvoidmaintenance constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The emergency power function is merged with the APU system rather than using a separate RAT. The APU's existing fuel supply infrastructure is utilized for emergency power, and the same APU unit that provides non-propulsive power also serves as the emergency power source. This integration eliminates the need for a separate RAT and its associated maintenance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The RAT is extracted from the aircraft system entirely. Instead of installing and maintaining a separate RAT, the patent extracts the emergency power function and assigns it to the APU, which already has the necessary infrastructure. This removes the maintenance burden of the RAT while preserving emergency power capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Device complexity

If the APU uses common fuel supply from aircraft engines, then fuel infrastructure is simplified, but the APU is vulnerable to fuel contamination affecting reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel supply circuitVSAvoidemergency power supply
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel supply system is segmented into a common fuel supply for normal APU operation and a separate emergency fuel supply for emergency power mode. The common supply uses the aircraft's existing fuel infrastructure, while the emergency supply includes dedicated fuel tanks and circulation systems that are isolated from contamination sources. This segmentation allows simplified overall architecture while ensuring reliability through isolated emergency fuel paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces unnecessary loads and maintenance costs by allowing the APU to efficiently supply emergency power to vital systems without contaminating the main fuel system, enhancing aircraft operational reliability and safety.

Implementation Method 1

Hydrogen is either directly stored in a solid, liquid or gaseous state in the specific source, or produced by appropriate refining of kerosene stored in that specific source. Advantageously, the storage of hydrogen is carried out in a solid form, which is particularly stable and which allows an almost instantaneous change of state in liquid or gaseous form by a pyrotechnic ignition.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 2

the storage of hydrogen is carried out in a solid form, which is particularly stable and which allows an almost instantaneous change of state in liquid or gaseous form by a pyrotechnic ignition.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrotechnic ignition: Pyroelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2662286B1Method of supplying auxiliary power from an auxiliary power unit and corresponding architecture
Publication Date: 2015.03.04 MICROTURBO SA
  • EP2662286B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2662286B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention aims to eliminate the need for a backup turbine or RAT in an aircraft by proposing to dedicate an auxiliary power unit (APU) to providing emergency power. To this end, the APU is protected from the main common cause of failure with engines—namely, fuel contamination—by implementing an independent fuel supply. An auxiliary power supply architecture comprises an APU (2; 23 to 27) and a basic fuel supply circuit (3) (4), including a fuel storage tank (31), a primary circulation line (32), and secondary lines (33, 34) for injecting this fuel into the combustion chambers (21) of the APU (2) via suitable injectors (22).This architecture (1) also includes another independent circuit (5) for supplying the APU group (2), comprising an emergency tank (51), in particular of hydrogen, a specific primary conduit (52) for circulating the emergency fuel (6) and secondary conduits (53, 54) for injecting the emergency fuel (6) into the combustion chambers (21) by appropriate injectors (28).