AQFP Circuit Placement With Multi-Phase Clock Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic design automation (EDA) tools are inadequate for placing superconducting electronics (SCE) circuits that utilize multiple clock phases, such as adiabatic quantum flux parametron (AQFP) circuits, due to differences in clock signal distribution and phase requirements, leading to inefficiencies and the need for specialized tools.

Innovation Solution

Adapt CMOS placement tools to accommodate multi-phase clock signals in SCE circuits by ensuring all output ports are associated with the same clock phase through levelized placement, buffer insertion, and row splitting, while adhering to constraints like maximum net length and row bounds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If existing EDA tools are used for placing SCE circuits with multiple clock phases, then the placement process is simplified, but the clock phase alignment and signal integrity cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement process simplicityVSAvoidclock phase alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The placement process is segmented into multiple passes: initial placement using standard EDA tools, followed by specialized post-processing steps including buffer insertion and row splitting. This segmentation allows leveraging existing tools while adding targeted functionality to handle clock phase requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Buffers are inserted as intermediary elements between cells to adjust clock phase alignment. These buffers act as mediators that synchronize clock signals across different rows and columns, ensuring proper phase alignment without requiring complete redesign of the placement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If levelized placement with buffer insertion is implemented, then clock phase alignment is ensured, but the placement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclock phase alignmentVSAvoidplacement process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The netlist is levelized during the design phase before physical placement, organizing cells into logical groups based on their clock phase requirements. This preliminary organization simplifies subsequent placement steps by pre-grouping cells that share the same clock phase, reducing the complexity of the actual placement process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The placement process is made dynamic through iterative row splitting and buffer insertion. The algorithm adapts the floorplan structure during placement, dynamically adjusting row configurations and inserting buffers where needed, rather than following a rigid predetermined structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If row splitting is performed to accommodate clock phases, then clock distribution is improved, but the floorplan area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclock distributionVSAvoidfloorplan area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Row splitting is applied locally only where clock phase alignment requirements demand it, rather than uniformly across the entire floorplan. This selective approach ensures proper clock distribution in critical areas while minimizing the overall area impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple rows that require the same clock phase are merged into unified placement regions, allowing shared clock distribution infrastructure. This merging reduces redundant clock routing and minimizes the additional area required for clock distribution networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If maximum net length constraints are enforced, then signal integrity is improved, but the placement flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal integrityVSAvoidplacement flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Buffers are strategically inserted as intermediary elements to extend the effective driving capability of cells. These buffers act as signal repeaters that maintain signal integrity over longer distances, allowing greater placement flexibility without compromising signal quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The placement process continuously monitors and enforces maximum net length constraints during cell positioning, rather than applying them as fixed boundaries. This continuous adjustment maintains signal integrity while adapting to placement opportunities, preserving flexibility within the constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12493732B1Adiabatic quantum-flux-parametron placement
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 SYNOPSYS INC
  • US12493732B1 patent drawing
  • US12493732B1 patent drawing
  • US12493732B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Cells in a superconducting electronics (SCE) netlist may be levelized. The SCE may use multiple clock phases, and each level in the levelized SCE netlist may be associated with a clock phase. Buffers may be inserted in the SCE netlist so that output ports of the SCE netlist are associated with the same clock phase. A floorplan may be created for the SCE netlist. A placed SCE netlist may be generated based on the floorplan, where cells in each row of the placed SCE netlist may be clocked using the same clock phase.