Aquaculture Foam Trap System for Chemical-Free Water Purification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fish farming systems face challenges in efficiently removing foam from water treatment processes without relying on chemical defoamers, which are costly and environmentally unfriendly, and require solutions that adapt to varying water properties and foam formation rates during different phases of fish farming.

Innovation Solution

A foam trap system that mechanically collects and removes foam using a rotating impeller driven by falling water, which guides foam towards extraction points connected to the outer periphery of the aeration system, and an alternative V or U-shaped surface skimmer that collects foam from fish vessels and directs it to a vacuum-connected foam trap for removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If chemical defoamers are used to remove foam, then foam formation is controlled, but cost increases and environmental impact worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam formationVSAvoidchemical pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes foam physically from the water using a skimmer device that collects foam at the water surface and transports it away through a conduit, eliminating the need for chemical defoamers and their associated environmental harm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical system (defoamers) with a mechanical system (skimmer device with floating skimmer body, conduit, and pump) that physically removes foam without introducing chemicals into the water

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a fixed foam removal system is used, then foam is removed, but adaptability to changing water properties and foam formation rates is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefoam removalVSAvoidadaptation to water property changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The floating skimmer body dynamically adjusts its position and foam collection capacity based on the volume and characteristics of foam present, allowing the system to adapt automatically to varying foam formation rates without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the natural buoyancy of the floating skimmer body and the inherent properties of foam to drive the removal process, with the skimmer automatically rising with foam accumulation and the pump activating when foam reaches the collection point

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If water level jumps are increased to improve aeration, then aeration efficiency improves, but foam formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaeration efficiencyVSAvoidfoam formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention converts the harmful effect of foam formation (caused by necessary water level jumps for aeration) into a beneficial process by collecting and removing the foam, which simultaneously purifies the water by taking impurities out with the foam

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system effectively removes foam without chemical defoamers, reducing costs and environmental impact, while allowing for adaptation to changing water properties and foam formation rates, thereby improving water quality and aeration efficiency in fish farming.

Implementation Method 1

the impeller rotation is hydraulically driven by falling water supplied in the upper zone of the aeration system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic driving: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

the impeller having a buoyancy at the water surface the aeration system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 3

a foam trap for collecting foam which is removed from an aeration system by vacuum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum suction: Vacuum

Implementation Method 4

the falling water is split into droplets in an aeration medium before hitting the impeller, where the impeller blades have a twist causing one-way rotation as the falling water droplets strike/runs off the leaves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Implementation Method 5

a V or U shaped surface skimmer in the vessel, where the skimmer has a design which collects foam from the vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension: Surface Tension

Implementation Method 6

where vacuum is used to suck the foam from the front edge of the skimmer and to the foam trap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP4195919B1A breeding farm for fish and other living aquatic organisms
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 ALVESTAD
  • EP4195919B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4195919B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4195919B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A breeding farm for fish and other living aquatic organisms is described comprising a breeding vessel (1), a pipe (3) arranged to carry water from the breeding vessel (1) to an aeration tank (4), where the water is then returned to the breeding vessel (1). The farm further comprises an extraction device (15) for foam from the farm, 5 the extraction device (15) being mounted on the aeration tank (4), and where the foam is conveyed to a foam trap (10) where the foam is broken down. (Fig. 1) 10