Aquatic Device Light Guide for Shark Deterrence

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shark attacks on surfers and other water users have increased due to mistaken identity, as the silhouette and shadow of aquatic devices resemble natural prey, leading to unprovoked 'hit and run' attacks in areas with poor visibility and harsh conditions.

Innovation Solution

Equipping surfboards and other aquatic devices with light guides that absorb light on one portion and emit it from another, altering the silhouette and reducing or eliminating the shadow, thereby making them less recognizable to sharks as their natural prey.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If aquatic devices have a standard solid structure, then they provide buoyancy and support, but they cast shadows and create silhouettes that resemble natural prey, increasing shark attack risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety from shark attacksVSAvoidshark attacks due to prey-like silhouette
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies optical modification by incorporating light guides and reflective materials into the aquatic device. These components manipulate light to create a shimmering, non-solid appearance that changes with viewing angle and light conditions, transforming the device's visual characteristics from a static prey-like silhouette to a dynamic, unpredictable optical pattern that sharks do not recognize as prey.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The light guides and reflective elements act as intermediaries between the solid structure and the surrounding water environment. These optical components modify how light interacts with the device, creating a visual barrier that prevents sharks from perceiving the underlying solid form, thereby mediating the interaction between the device and potential predators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of manufacture

If aquatic devices maintain a conventional design, then they are simple and easy to manufacture, but they create recognizable shadows that provoke shark attacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimple constructionVSAvoidshadow creation leading to shark attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates light guides and reflective materials that create dynamic optical effects. These components transform the appearance of the device by manipulating light reflection and refraction, producing a shimmering effect that changes with viewing angle and illumination, thereby eliminating the static shadow problem while maintaining manufacturing feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Device complexity

If aquatic devices have a uniform appearance, then they are structurally simple, but they create consistent silhouettes that sharks can easily identify as prey

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidvisibility to sharks as prey
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs light guides and reflective surfaces that create variable optical appearances. These elements cause the device to display different visual characteristics depending on lighting conditions and viewing angles, transforming the uniform silhouette into a dynamically changing optical pattern that disrupts shark prey recognition while preserving structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces the likelihood of shark attacks by modifying the aquatic devices' appearance, making them less identifiable as prey, thus minimizing the risk of unprovoked encounters.

Implementation Method 1

a light guide adapted to adsorb light which impinges upon a first portion of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

and which is further adapted to emit light from a second portion of the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Luminescence

Data Source

PatentUS7811144B2Aquatic device with light-emitting surface
Publication Date: 2010.10.12 FRESNEL TECH INC
  • US7811144B2 patent drawing
  • US7811144B2 patent drawing
  • US7811144B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aquatic device is provided which has a light-emitting surface. The device (101) is equipped with a light guide (105) adapted to adsorb light impinging on a first surface (113) of the device, and to emit light from a second surface (115) of the device.