Aquatic Animal Passage Openings for Voluntary In-Tank Size Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sorting methods for live aquatic animals, particularly crustaceans, are invasive, cause stress, and result in high mortality and injury due to their sensitivity to physical disturbances, often requiring labor-intensive manual handling and expensive equipment.

Innovation Solution

A device that divides a water tank into passage-facilitating and passage-obstructing regions with adjustable passage openings, using guide elements as climbing aids and retaining elements as circular walls to allow voluntary self-sorting of aquatic animals, minimizing physical contact and stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional sorting methods (boxes with slots or roller systems) are used to sort aquatic animals, then sorting efficiency and size separation are improved, but animal stress and injury increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting efficiencyVSAvoidanimal stress and injury
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables aquatic animals to sort themselves voluntarily through passage devices with size-adapted openings. Animals swim through passages matching their size without human intervention or mechanical forcing, eliminating stress from manual handling while achieving efficient size-based separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces invasive mechanical sorting systems (rollers, forced passage) with a passive hydraulic system where water flow naturally guides animals through appropriate passages. The sorting mechanism relies on animal swimming behavior and water current rather than mechanical forcing, reducing injury risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If aquatic animals are taken out of water for sorting, then sorting precision is improved, but animal mortality and stress increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting precisionVSAvoidanimal survival rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses water flow (hydraulics) as the primary sorting medium. Animals remain in water throughout the sorting process, swimming through passage devices submerged in the tank. Water current assists in guiding animals through appropriate passages while maintaining their natural aquatic environment, ensuring both precision and survival.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Device complexity

If manual sorting methods are used, then equipment investment costs are reduced, but labor intensity and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment costVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires minimal human intervention after initial setup. Animals autonomously navigate passage devices and sort themselves by size, eliminating the need for continuous manual sorting labor. The passive hydraulic system maintains operation without energy input, reducing both equipment complexity and operational labor costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If passage openings are made smaller to improve size separation precision, then sorting precision is improved, but passage obstruction and animal blocking increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize separation precisionVSAvoidpassage flow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the sorting system into multiple parallel passage devices, each with size-adapted openings. Instead of one large passage that would block animals, multiple smaller passages work simultaneously, increasing total flow capacity while maintaining precise size separation. Each passage handles a specific size range, preventing congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extends sorting from a single-dimensional passage to a multi-dimensional array of passages arranged in parallel. This spatial arrangement allows simultaneous processing of multiple animals through different passages, maintaining high precision size separation while preventing blocking through distributed flow paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12478049B2Devices for the voluntary self-sorting of live aquatic animals
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 ALFRED WEGENER INST HELMHOLTZ ZENT FUR POLAR & MEERESFORSCHUNG
  • US12478049B2 patent drawing
  • US12478049B2 patent drawing
  • US12478049B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for voluntary self-sorting of live aquatic animals, including at least one passage device, by which a water tank is divided into a passage-facilitating region and a passage-obstructing region. The at least one passage device has a plurality of passage openings that can be adapted in size to the aquatic animals to be sorted. Guides are arranged towards the passage-facilitating region and retainers are arranged towards the passage-obstructing region on the passage device. The guides are configured as climbing aids and the retainers are configured as circular walls, which are adapted to a contour of the passage openings. The passage openings are flat and arranged in a carrier plate, and have a height that is larger than a height of the aquatic animals to be sorted.