Aqueous Phase Oxidation Process Oxygen Transfer Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aqueous phase oxidation processes face challenges such as high energy consumption, emission of noxious gases, incomplete metal recovery, and difficulties in controlling oxygen gas supply and pressure fluctuations, leading to inconsistent reaction rates and equipment oversizing.

Innovation Solution

An improved aqueous phase oxidation process that involves pre-processing feedstock to uniform particle size, using a combination of nitric and sulfuric acids, and dispersing oxygen gas from the reactor headspace into the reaction mixture to maintain consistent oxygen levels, allowing for efficient oxidation of organic and inorganic materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If oxygen gas is bubbled into the aqueous phase to oxidize reduction products of nitric acid, then oxidation efficiency is improved, but oxygen gas separates and collects in the headspace requiring large amounts to be supplied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation efficiencyVSAvoidoxygen gas consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system where oxygen transfer efficiency is continuously monitored and used to adjust the oxygen supply rate. This ensures optimal oxidation efficiency while preventing excessive oxygen consumption and headspace accumulation through real-time regulation of the oxygen input based on actual transfer performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If oxygen gas supply is controlled based on headspace measurement, then control simplicity is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to tenuous relationship between headspace and aqueous phase oxygen levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidoxygen gas measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the indirect mechanical measurement approach (headspace oxygen measurement) with direct measurement of oxygen transfer efficiency into the aqueous phase. This substitution enables precise monitoring of actual oxygen availability to microorganisms, eliminating the decoupling between headspace and liquid phase oxygen levels while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If reactor pressure is maintained high for oxidation reactions, then reaction rate is improved, but pressure fluctuations make continuous feed material introduction difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction rateVSAvoidfeed material introduction consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic pressure control systems that can rapidly adjust reactor pressure to accommodate continuous feed material introduction while maintaining optimal oxidation conditions. The system dynamically balances pressure stability with reaction rate requirements, enabling consistent feeding without sacrificing productivity through real-time pressure modulation during the oxidation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If residence time is extended to account for feed material inconsistencies, then oxidation completeness is improved, but equipment size must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation completenessVSAvoidreactor volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes parameter changes including temperature, pressure, and oxygen transfer rate to accelerate oxidation reactions, enabling complete oxidation within shorter residence times. By dynamically adjusting these parameters in response to feed material characteristics, the system achieves reliable oxidation completeness without requiring oversized equipment, thus reducing capital costs while maintaining treatment efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves complete or near-complete oxidation of feedstocks with reduced energy consumption, minimal gas emissions, and improved process control, enabling efficient and cost-effective oxidation of various materials.

Implementation Method 1

The feedstock is oxidized in an aqueous reaction mixture by one or more oxidizing acids

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

Oxygen gas may be supplied to the reaction mixture to reoxidize the reduction products of the oxidizing acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

The oxygen gas was initially bubbled into the aqueous phase but quickly separated and collected in the headspace of the reactor where it was eventually removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRedox reactions: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentUS8168847B2Aqueous phase oxidation process
Publication Date: 2012.05.01 EARTH RENEWAL GROUP
  • US8168847B2 patent drawing
  • US8168847B2 patent drawing
  • US8168847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved oxidization process may be used to oxidize a wide variety of feedstocks. Oxidation takes place in a reactor where the feedstock is mixed with an oxidizing acid, such as nitric acid. The reaction mixture may also include a secondary oxidizing acid such as sulfuric acid as well as water and/or dissolved and mechanically mixed oxygen gas. The reactor may be maintained at an elevated pressure such as at least approximately 2070 kPa or desirably at least approximately 2800 kPa. The temperature of the reaction mixture may be maintained at no more than 210° C.