AR Acoustic Simulation via ML Image Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for augmented reality (AR) struggle to efficiently match virtual sound with equivalent real-world sound, leading to aural delays and increased processing requirements, which degrade the user experience and increase costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning (ML) techniques to classify images of real-world environments directly into acoustic presets, allowing for the prediction of acoustic properties such as reverberation characteristics, and subsequently creating an acoustic environment simulation that seamlessly blends virtual sound with the local environment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional multistep processes are used to match virtual sound with real-world sound, then acoustic accuracy is improved, but processing complexity and aural delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical signal processing systems with a machine learning-based system that uses neural networks to directly predict acoustic parameters from images. This substitution eliminates multiple processing steps while maintaining acoustic accuracy through data-driven models trained on acoustic field data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from processing audio signals through complex filters and transforms to directly predicting acoustic parameters (reverb time, clarity, warmth) from visual data. This parameter transformation enables simpler processing while maintaining accuracy through the learned relationships between images and acoustic characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If conventional multistep processes are used to match virtual sound with real-world sound, then acoustic accuracy is improved, but processing time and aural delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic accuracyVSAvoidaural delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-training machine learning models on large datasets of acoustic field measurements and corresponding images. This pre-computation enables the system to quickly predict acoustic parameters in real-time without performing complex calculations during actual audio processing, thus reducing aural delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes time-consuming conventional signal processing algorithms with optimized machine learning inference that can rapidly predict acoustic parameters from images, significantly reducing processing time and eliminating noticeable aural delays in the audio output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If conventional multistep processes are used to match virtual sound with real-world sound, then acoustic accuracy is improved, but device cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic accuracyVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive hardware-based acoustic measurement and processing systems with software-based machine learning models that run on standard processors. This substitution maintains acoustic accuracy while reducing hardware requirements and device cost through efficient neural network implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the computational approach from heavy numerical simulations and complex signal processing to optimized machine learning inference that can be performed with lower computational power, thereby reducing device cost while maintaining acoustic parameter accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If conventional multistep processes are used to match virtual sound with real-world sound, then acoustic accuracy is improved, but processing requirements and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacoustic accuracyVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes energy-intensive conventional acoustic simulation and signal processing systems with optimized machine learning models that require significantly less computational energy to produce comparable acoustic accuracy, thereby reducing processing requirements and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the computational parameters and algorithms from heavy numerical methods to efficient machine learning inference that consumes less energy while maintaining acoustic parameter prediction accuracy, thus reducing overall processing energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3903510B1Room acoustics simulation using deep learning image analysis
Publication Date: 2025.04.09 DTS INC(US)
  • EP3903510B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3903510B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3903510B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method comprises: receiving an image of a real-world environment; using a machine learning classifier, classifying the image to produce classifications associated with acoustic presets for an acoustic environment simulation, the acoustic presets each including acoustic parameters that represent sound reverberation; and selecting an acoustic preset among the acoustic presets based on the classifications.