Portable AR Device for Aircraft Damage Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for assessing aircraft damage are time-consuming and costly, requiring specialized personnel to travel to remote locations, and are inefficient in accurately determining damage severity, especially in critical areas like RVSM airspace.

Innovation Solution

A portable electronic device with a processor and structural database that uses a reference marker to determine the actual size of damage by comparing it to a maximum allowable size, allowing for quick and accurate assessments without specialized training, and updates flight maintenance and dispatch databases accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a qualified mechanic travels to the outstation to inspect the damaged aircraft, then the damage assessment accuracy is improved, but the travel time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a digital copy of the aircraft's structural data and damage assessment capabilities in the form of a portable electronic device with augmented reality display. This copying principle allows the assessment functionality to be replicated and deployed to any location without requiring physical travel of specialized personnel, thereby maintaining assessment accuracy while eliminating travel time losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The portable electronic device acts as an intermediary between the damaged aircraft and the assessment process. It captures images of the damage, compares them against structural databases, and provides guidance through augmented reality display, serving as a mediator that enables accurate assessment without requiring the presence of qualified mechanics at the remote location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If specialized personnel are deployed for damage assessment, then the reliability of assessment is improved, but the operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment reliabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service damage assessment through the portable electronic device that autonomously captures damage images, processes them through the structural database, and provides assessment results. The augmented reality display guides users through the process, allowing non-specialized personnel to perform reliable assessments without requiring specialized expertise, thereby eliminating the need to deploy expensive specialized personnel while maintaining assessment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of deploying human specialists with an automated electronic system. The portable device with processor, structural database, and augmented reality display substitutes for the physical presence of qualified mechanics, providing reliable assessment functionality through automated image processing and comparison algorithms while significantly reducing operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If manual measurement and diagram comparison methods are used, then the equipment complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoiddamage size measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of the assessment process by using digital image capture and processing instead of manual measurement. The portable electronic device captures images with known reference markers, uses processors to automatically calculate damage dimensions based on pixel-to-real-world conversions, and compares against digital structural databases. This parameter change from manual to automated digital measurement maintains equipment simplicity while dramatically improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If the aircraft is restricted to non-RVSM airspace due to damage, then the safety is improved, but the productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidflight operations efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary damage assessment using the portable electronic device and augmented reality display before making routing decisions. By providing immediate, accurate damage evaluation at the outstation location, the system enables dispatchers to make informed decisions about whether the aircraft can operate in RVSM airspace or requires restrictions. This preliminary assessment prevents unnecessary productivity losses by avoiding automatic grounding or routing restrictions when the damage may not actually require such limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9776738B2Augmented reality system for assessing an affected area of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 THE BOEING CO
  • US9776738B2 patent drawing
  • US9776738B2 patent drawing
  • US9776738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable electronic device for assessing an affected area of an aircraft is disclosed. A reference marker having a known size is located on the aircraft. The portable electronic device includes a processor in communication with a structural database, where the structural database includes a template that defines a maximum allowable size of damage to the aircraft. The processor executes instructions for determining an actual size of the affected area based on the known size of the reference marker. The processor also executes instructions for comparing the actual size of the affected area with the maximum allowable size of damage to the aircraft. The processor further executes instructions for determining that the actual size of the affected area exceeds the maximum allowable size of damage to the aircraft.