AR Route Planning for Drone Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for generating pre-planned flight paths for drones are limited by outdated maps and fail to account for current obstacles, leading to potential collisions and mismatched user intentions.

Innovation Solution

An augmented reality (AR) experience is used to visualize the environment in real-time, allowing users to input and adjust flight paths by tracing desired routes, which are then converted into autonomous travel instructions for drones, incorporating real-time environmental data and obstacle avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional systems use outdated maps for flight path planning, then the system complexity is reduced, but the reliability of collision avoidance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning of the environment using cameras and sensors before generating the flight path. This pre-scanning creates an up-to-date collision model that is then used for route calculation, ensuring reliability without requiring complex real-time processing during flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary collision model that translates real-time environmental data into a format usable for flight path planning. This model acts as a mediator between the physical environment and the flight control system, improving reliability without directly increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If real-time environmental scanning is performed to identify current obstacles, then the reliability of flight safety is improved, but the loss of time for flight planning increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidflight planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs environmental scanning and collision model generation as preliminary actions before the user inputs the flight route. By completing these time-consuming tasks in advance, the system ensures flight safety without delaying the actual flight planning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs scanning in the general area of interest before the user finalizes their route. This partial scanning approach provides sufficient safety information without requiring exhaustive scanning of every possible area, thus balancing safety with time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If users manually trace flight routes in AR environment, then the adaptability to user intentions is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to complex interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser intention alignmentVSAvoidroute input simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a virtual copy of the real-world environment in the AR interface, complete with detected obstacles and terrain features. Users interact with this simplified copy rather than raw sensor data, making route tracing intuitive while maintaining adaptability to user intentions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The AR interface serves multiple functions simultaneously: it displays the real-world view, overlays detected obstacles, shows the planned route, and provides interaction controls. This multi-functionality consolidates complex operations into a single unified interface, improving ease of operation while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If detailed collision models are generated from pre-scanning, then the manufacturing precision of flight path planning is improved, but the loss of time for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight path accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The collision model generation is performed as a preliminary action before the user traces the flight route. This allows detailed processing to occur in advance, ensuring high precision in the final flight path without delaying user interaction or route planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system generates collision models with sufficient detail for the specific area of interest rather than creating exhaustive models of the entire environment. This partial modeling approach provides the necessary precision for safe flight planning while reducing overall data processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10532814B2Augmented reality travel route planning
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 DISNEY ENTERPRISES INC
  • US10532814B2 patent drawing
  • US10532814B2 patent drawing
  • US10532814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus such as a head-mounted display (HMD) may have a camera for capturing a visual scene for presentation via the HMD. A user of the apparatus may specify a pre-planned travel route for a vehicle within the visual scene via an augmented reality (AR) experience generated by the HMD. The pre-planned travel route may be overlaid on the visual scene in the AR experience so that the user can account for real-time environmental conditions determined through the AR experience. The pre-planned travel route may be transferred to the vehicle and used as autonomous travel instructions.