AR Component Inspection With CAD Latching Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft inspection methods require human intervention for component orientation and positioning, leading to inefficiencies and potential delays due to human limitations and labor intensity, especially in remote worksites with less expertise.

Innovation Solution

A self-validating augmented reality system using a trained latching model that superimposes a CAD image onto a real-world image, determining latching through a neural network, and providing real-time graphical feedback for accurate component inspection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If human experts perform visual inspection of aircraft components, then inspection reliability is improved, but labor intensity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection reliabilityVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs self-validation by automatically comparing captured component images against CAD models and inspection criteria, eliminating the need for continuous human expert intervention while maintaining inspection reliability through automated defect detection and validation mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical human inspection process with an automated computer vision system that uses image processing, pattern recognition, and comparison algorithms to detect defects, thereby improving efficiency while maintaining reliability through consistent automated evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If human experts perform visual inspection, then accurate judgment is achieved, but human limitations on perception and concentration reduce overall accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidperception reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-validation by automatically verifying inspection results against predefined criteria and CAD models, eliminating human perceptual limitations and concentration variability while maintaining high accuracy through consistent automated evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that continuously validate inspection results by comparing captured images against reference models and inspection standards, ensuring high measurement precision through iterative verification without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If automated inspection aids are deployed at remote worksites with less expertise, then accessibility is improved, but inspection capability decreases due to lack of expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworksite accessibilityVSAvoidinspection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection system performs self-validation by automatically comparing captured images against embedded CAD models and inspection criteria, enabling remote worksites to conduct reliable inspections without requiring local expert knowledge, thus improving accessibility while maintaining capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates universal inspection capabilities that can be deployed across multiple worksite locations with varying expertise levels, using standardized comparison algorithms and reference models to maintain consistent inspection reliability regardless of location or local expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If manual orientation and positioning of components is performed during inspection, then proper alignment is achieved, but time consumption and labor intensity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent alignmentVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual orientation and positioning with automated image processing and pattern recognition algorithms that automatically detect component alignment and orientation from captured images, achieving precise alignment verification without time-consuming manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection system performs self-validation by automatically analyzing component orientation and alignment from captured images against reference models, eliminating the need for manual positioning while maintaining manufacturing precision through automated geometric comparison

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12530856B2Self-validating augmented reality inspection of a component
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 THE BOEING CO
  • US12530856B2 patent drawing
  • US12530856B2 patent drawing
  • US12530856B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for self-validating augmented reality inspection of a component are provided, including receiving an image of the component in a real world environment, determining a virtual camera pose relative to a CAD model of the component in a CAD environment that is substantially identical to the camera pose relative to the component in the world space, generating a CAD image at the virtual camera pose, removing background from the CAD image, generating a composite image by superimposing the masked CAD image on the image of the component in the real world environment, providing the composite image to a trained latching model to thereby make a latching determination of whether the CAD image is latched to the captured image of the component in the real world environment, where the latching model is trained on a dataset including ground truth composite image examples of latched and unlatched components.