Soybean Cultivar AR1215867-2 Marker-Assisted Breeding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Soybean breeding is complex due to self-pollination, requiring intensive research and development to produce new cultivars with desired traits like herbicide resistance, disease resistance, and improved yield, which is challenging due to the vast genetic diversity and unpredictability in breeding outcomes.

Innovation Solution

The development of soybean cultivar AR1215867-2, which includes transgenes for herbicide resistance, disease resistance, and modified fatty acid profiles, along with methods for introducing specific traits through crossing and selection techniques, such as backcrossing and marker-assisted selection, to produce progeny with desired characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional breeding methods are used to develop new soybean cultivars, then genetic diversity is maintained, but breeding outcomes are unpredictable and require intensive research and development

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic diversityVSAvoidbreeding outcome predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical breeding methods (manual crossing, selection, and evaluation) with molecular marker-based identification systems. DNA markers allow breeders to precisely identify and track specific genes and traits at the molecular level, transforming unpredictable genetic outcomes into predictable, selectable characteristics. This substitution of molecular analysis for phenotypic selection directly resolves the contradiction between maintaining genetic diversity and achieving reliable breeding outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through marker-assisted selection, where DNA markers provide continuous information about the genetic composition of breeding populations. This feedback allows breeders to make informed decisions about which plants to advance, cross, or discard, creating a controlled iterative process that maintains genetic diversity while ensuring reliable progression toward desired traits. The molecular markers serve as real-time feedback on genetic status, replacing the trial-and-error nature of traditional breeding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If cross-pollination is used to introduce new traits, then genetic variation increases, but the process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegenetic variationVSAvoidbreeding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical cross-pollination and phenotypic screening processes with molecular marker analysis. Instead of manually controlling pollination and then evaluating numerous phenotypic traits to confirm genetic variation, breeders use DNA markers to directly identify plants with desired genetic variations. This substitution dramatically simplifies the breeding process while maintaining the ability to introduce and track new traits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces molecular markers as intermediaries between cross-pollination events and trait expression. These markers serve as reliable indicators that mediate the connection between genetic manipulation and phenotypic outcomes, allowing breeders to track the introduction of new traits without having to evaluate complex phenotypic expressions. The markers act as a simplified interface that translates complex genetic changes into actionable breeding decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If extensive phenotypic evaluation is performed to select superior cultivars, then trait accuracy improves, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrait selection accuracyVSAvoidbreeding program duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces extensive phenotypic evaluation (visual inspection, field testing, and environmental assessment) with molecular marker-based genotypic identification. DNA markers provide direct information about an plant's genetic makeup, allowing breeders to identify superior cultivars based on their genetic potential rather than waiting for phenotypic expression. This substitution maintains high selection accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required, as genetic analysis can be performed at any growth stage without environmental confounding factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary genetic identification using molecular markers before phenotypic expression occurs. By evaluating plants at the DNA level early in their development, breeders can identify superior genotypes without waiting for plants to mature and express their traits phenotypically. This preliminary genetic screening allows for early selection decisions, reducing the overall breeding program duration while maintaining accurate trait identification through marker-trait associations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10091968B2Soybean cultivar AR1215867-2
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECITON AG

AI summary

The present invention is in the field of soybean variety AR1215867-2 breeding and development. The present invention particularly relates to the soybean variety AR1215867-2 and its seed, cells, germplasm, plant parts, and progeny, and methods of using AR1215867-2 in a breeding program.