Electric Arc Detection Using Reflectograms to Filter EMI Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric arc detection systems in electrical systems, particularly in aviation environments, face challenges in reliably detecting series arcs due to electromagnetic interference (EMI) noise and false positives, especially in DC voltage systems, which complicates localization and validation against cable resistance standards.

Innovation Solution

A method using Multi Carrier Time Domain Reflectometry (MCTDR) to analyze reflectograms, incrementing a detection counter with each confirmed arc identification, and applying threshold comparisons to validate arc positions over multiple iterations, reducing the impact of EMI noise and ensuring reliable detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reflectometry is used to detect electric arcs, then arc presence and location can be detected, but reliability is impacted by arc characteristics and system properties causing false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection process is segmented into multiple iterations where a detection counter accumulates confirmed arc identifications. The system divides the detection task into discrete steps: analyzing reflectograms, incrementing counters for confirmed arcs, comparing counter values against thresholds, and only generating diagnostic information when thresholds are met. This segmentation reduces false positives by requiring multiple confirmations before final detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by analyzing reflectograms and incrementing detection counters before final arc detection is confirmed. Threshold comparisons are performed in advance, and only when the detection counter reaches the threshold value does the system generate diagnostic information. This preliminary action filter prevents false positives by requiring pre-confirmation of arc presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If detection threshold is lowered to detect series arcs, then detection sensitivity improves, but false positives increase due to EMI noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc detection sensitivityVSAvoidEMI noise impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback through a detection counter that accumulates arc identifications across multiple iterations. Each reflectogram analysis provides feedback to the counter, which then determines whether threshold conditions are met. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain low detection thresholds for sensitivity while using iterative confirmation to filter out EMI noise-induced false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs excessive analysis by requiring multiple reflectogram analyses and counter confirmations before final detection. Instead of detecting arcs from a single reflectogram, the system accumulates detections across multiple iterations, performing more analysis than strictly necessary for simple detection. This excessive action ensures that EMI noise does not trigger false positives while maintaining sensitivity to genuine arcs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If multiple iterations with detection counter are used, then false positives are reduced, but detection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by analyzing reflectograms at regular intervals and incrementing the detection counter with each confirmed arc identification. The periodic analysis allows the counter to accumulate sufficient confirmations for reliable detection while maintaining a structured time-based approach. This periodic action balances the need for multiple confirmations with efficient use of detection time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method provides robust and reliable detection of electric arcs, minimizing false positives and ensuring timely localization, even in noisy conditions, thereby enhancing system reliability and reducing unnecessary maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

A well-known approach used for the detection of electric arcs in an electrical system is the reflectometry. This method allows not only the detection of the presence of an electric arc but also their localization in the system.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflectometry: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12571830B2Detection of electric arcs in an electrical system
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 SAFRAN ELECTRICAL & POWER
  • US12571830B2 patent drawing
  • US12571830B2 patent drawing
  • US12571830B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for detecting an electrical arc in an electrical system including analyzing a reflectogram representative of a spatial distribution of impedance in said electrical system and, when an electric arc is identified in the reflectogram, incrementing a detection counter by one unit.