Arc Detection Testing via Variable Luminance Light Source

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing arc detecting systems lack flexibility in testing, particularly when different components of the system are placed at varying distances, and there is a need for a method to ensure proper functioning across different realizations of the system.

Innovation Solution

A testing arrangement and method that involves a light source emitting test light with increasing luminance levels, allowing the optical detector to determine system operability by detecting the test light at any level, with the option to discontinue testing once detection is confirmed, and the ability to discern test light from ambient light.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed-length testing signal considerably longer than an arc signal is used, then the detector can be tested without triggering arc detection, but the testing method lacks flexibility for different system realizations with varying component distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector functionality verificationVSAvoidtesting flexibility for different system configurations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by varying the luminance level of the test light signal dynamically during testing. Instead of using a fixed-length signal, the system adjusts the light intensity parameter to different levels (including levels that would trigger arc detection and levels that would not) to comprehensively verify detector functionality across all operational ranges. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining reliability through thorough testing while achieving adaptability through parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If pulses of triangular shape with fixed duty cycle are used for testing, then the detector response can be analyzed for linearity, but the testing approach cannot accommodate different component distances in various system realizations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector linearity analysisVSAvoidapplicability to different system realizations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the test signal characteristics variable rather than fixed. The system dynamically adjusts pulse width, duty cycle, and luminance level based on the specific testing requirements and system configuration. This allows the same testing apparatus to adapt to different component distances and system realizations while maintaining the ability to perform linearity analysis when needed, thus resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If test light is emitted at multiple increasing luminance levels, then comprehensive detector functionality can be verified, but testing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational status verificationVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial or excessive action by emitting test light at multiple luminance levels that exceed what would be required for normal arc detection. By using luminance levels higher than typical arc signals, the system can verify detector functionality more quickly at each level, reducing the total testing time while still maintaining comprehensive verification through the multi-level approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a flexible and reliable method to verify the operational status of arc detecting systems, ensuring they function correctly across varying configurations and ambient conditions, reducing the risk of false arc detection.

Implementation Method 1

at least one light source (64), where the light source (64) is controlled by the testing unit (60) to emit a test light (TL) to the optical detector (42)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light Emitting Diode

Implementation Method 2

investigate if the optical detector (42) detects the emitted test light (TL)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20240319004A1Testing an arc detecting system
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US20240319004A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319004A1 patent drawing
  • US20240319004A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A testing arrangement is provided for an arc detecting system that includes at least one optical detector at a piece of electric equipment, where the testing arrangement includes at least one light source and a testing unit, where the testing unit is configured to control the light source to emit a test light to the optical detector with steps of increasing luminance starting from a minimum test level and continuing towards a maximum test level, investigate if the optical detector detects the emitted test light and determine that the arc detecting system is operational if the optical detector is able to detect the test light at any of the used test levels.