Arc Flash Hazard Assessment via Weighted Interpolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current arc flash hazard analysis methods are complex and difficult to predict due to the nonlinear and unpredictable nature of arc flash hazards, which pose significant risks to workers and require improved quantification for safer electrical equipment installation, maintenance, and repair practices.

Innovation Solution

The development of computer-based systems and methods for calculating potential incident energy exposure during arc flash events, using stored electrical equipment data to define an arc flash model function, estimating incident energy and arc current, and determining the arc flash protection boundary, considering factors like electrode orientation and system configuration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional arc flash hazard analysis methods are used, then comprehensive hazard assessment is achieved, but the complexity of the analysis increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard assessment accuracyVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The arc flash hazard analysis is segmented into distinct computational modules: incident energy calculation, arc flash boundary determination, and PPE selection guidance. Each module processes specific parameters independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive hazard assessment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A computer system acts as an intermediary between the complex electrical engineering calculations and the user, automatically performing arc flash hazard analyses that would otherwise require extensive manual computation and specialized knowledge of electromagnetic effects, plasma flow properties, and magnetohydrodynamics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If detailed arc flash analysis is performed, then worker protection is improved, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker protectionVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores arc flash hazard data for various electrical equipment configurations before actual hazard analyses are needed. This preliminary preparation allows rapid retrieval and combination of data during actual assessments, reducing on-site analysis time while maintaining detailed protection standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual arc flash hazard analysis procedures are replaced with automated computer-based calculations that perform complex electromagnetic and thermal computations instantaneously, eliminating the time-consuming manual calculation process while maintaining or improving analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2973091B1Systems and methods for arc flash hazard assessment
Publication Date: 2019.09.04 THE INST OF ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS
  • EP2973091B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2973091B1 patent drawingFigure 1B~1C
  • EP2973091B1 patent drawingFigure 1D

AI summary

An arc flash hazard assessment method includes storing electrical equipment data in memory, defining an arc flash model function based on the data, and estimating the model function based on a weighted average of interpolated and extrapolated values. The electrical equipment data may include an operating voltage, a fault current, and a clearing time. The model function is defined for at least three reference voltages V1, V2 and V3, with the interpolated value at operating voltage V, between voltages V1 and V2, and the extrapolated value from reference voltages V2 and V3. At the arc flash protection boundary, the estimated model function has a predefined incident energy value of 1.2 cal/cm2 (or about 5.02 J/cm2), or less.