Arc and Node Extrusion Assembly for Complex A-Surface Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for fabricating arcs with A-surfaces in metal extrusion structures are costly and inefficient, failing to effectively meet the requirements of aerodynamics, styling, and structural support in vehicle design.

Innovation Solution

The use of metal extrusions with elongated cavities and surfaces, connected along their length, and deformed using dynamic dies to form complex shapes that integrate with nodes, allowing for precise geometric fits and structural support while reducing manufacturing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If traditional methods are used to fabricate arcs with A-surfaces, then structural support and shape requirements can be met, but manufacturing costs and equipment requirements become excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidgeometric fit precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The arc structure is divided into two separate components: a first structure (cavity) and a second structure (elongated surface), which are manufactured independently and then connected. This segmentation allows each component to be produced using simpler, more cost-effective processes while maintaining the required geometric precision through dedicated forming operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The first structure with the elongated cavity is formed first, and then the second structure with the elongated surface is connected to it. The cavity can accommodate or nest with other components, allowing for integrated assembly that reduces manufacturing complexity and cost while preserving structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Shape

If complex shapes are formed to meet aerodynamics and styling requirements, then vehicle design objectives are achieved, but manufacturing complexity and equipment costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaerodynamic shapeVSAvoidmanufacturing equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process employs dynamic forming operations where the die configuration can be adjusted or changed during the forming process. This allows complex aerodynamic shapes to be achieved through controlled deformation of the metal extrusion using evolving die geometries, rather than requiring extremely complex static tooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from forming complex three-dimensional shapes directly to creating a two-dimensional elongated surface that is connected to a cavity structure. This dimensional simplification allows aerodynamic surfaces to be achieved through surface forming operations rather than complex volumetric shaping, reducing equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If single-direction deformation is used in manufacturing, then process simplicity is maintained, but complex geometric fits and structural requirements cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric fitVSAvoiddeformation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformation process is segmented into multiple independent forming operations: first deforming the cavity structure in one direction, then deforming the elongated surface in a different direction. This sequential multi-directional deformation allows complex geometric fits to be achieved through separate, more manageable forming steps rather than a single complex operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of cost-effective, aerodynamically optimized, and structurally robust arc and node structures that meet complex shape and functional requirements, enhancing vehicle design and manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

deforming the first structure in a first direction, and deforming the second structure in a second direction different than the first direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS11192168B2Systems and methods for arc and node design and manufacture
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 DIVERGENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11192168B2 patent drawing
  • US11192168B2 patent drawing
  • US11192168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A metal extrusion and nodes based structure is provided. The structure comprises one or more arc members connected by one or more node members, wherein the arc comprises (i) a wing feature which is configured to mate with one or more non-structural components, (ii) an internal passage feature which is configured to be inserted into a connecting feature of the corresponding node member, and (iii) one or more keying features formed from a mating interface with the corresponding node member.