Arc-Resistant Power Terminal with Insulated Tongue Bosses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The aerospace industry faces challenges with arcing and shorting between electrical terminals due to increased electrical voltages and frequencies, as well as environmental factors like humidity, which can lead to damage and system shutdowns, and existing methods to prevent arcing are insufficient.

Innovation Solution

An arc-resistant electrical terminal design featuring a conductive tongue with raised bosses and a dielectric insulation layer, where the insulation material covers the tongue except for the bosses, providing a conductive path while preventing arcing, and optionally incorporating a conversion coating to reduce conductivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If terminals are positioned close to one another to address space constraints, then space utilization is improved, but the likelihood of accidental shorting and arc tracking increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidarc tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A dielectric material is introduced as an intermediary substance between adjacent conductive terminals. This dielectric layer prevents direct electrical contact and arc tracking while allowing the terminals to remain in close proximity, thus maintaining space utilization while eliminating the harmful arcing effect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The dielectric material is applied selectively to specific surfaces of the terminals where arc tracking is most likely to occur. This localized application provides protection exactly where needed while minimizing the impact on overall terminal functionality and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If mechanical dividers are used to isolate terminals, then arc tracking is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc trackingVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical dividers with a dielectric coating or layer applied to the terminal surfaces. This substitution eliminates the need for complex mechanical separation structures while providing effective electrical isolation and arc tracking prevention through the insulating properties of the dielectric material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If separation distances between terminals are increased, then arc tracking is prevented, but space utilization deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearc trackingVSAvoidspace utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of increasing physical separation distance, a dielectric material is introduced as an intermediary layer between terminals. This allows terminals to maintain minimal physical spacing while the dielectric layer provides the necessary electrical isolation to prevent arc tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If terminals are exposed for making electrical contact, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of electrocution and arcing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical contactVSAvoidelectrocution risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The dielectric material is applied selectively to specific surfaces of the terminals, leaving contact surfaces exposed for electrical connection while covering other surfaces where arc tracking could occur. This localized differentiation maintains operational ease while providing protection against electrocution and arcing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The terminal significantly reduces arcing and associated damage, preventing arcing for up to eight hours in humid conditions, compared to conventional terminals which experience arcing within minutes, thereby enhancing safety and reliability.

Implementation Method 1

A layer of insulation material is formed on at least a portion of the tongue for preventing arcing at a connection point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical insulation: Dielectric

Implementation Method 2

a conversion coating layer is formed on the electrically conductive material of at least a portion of the tongue for reducing the conductivity of the tongue portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConversion coating: Coatings

Data Source

PatentEP3365945A1Arc resistant power terminal
Publication Date: 2018.08.29 CARLISLE INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES INC

AI summary

An arc-resistant electrical terminal (100) includes a mount portion (104) and a wire receiving portion (102) formed of an electrically conductive material. The wire receiving portion (102) is configured to be crimped onto a wire. The mount portion (104) includes a solid tongue (116) having opposing face surfaces. An aperture (126) is formed between the opposing face surfaces for connecting the terminal to a connection point. A layer of insulation material (230) is formed on at least a portion of the tongue for preventing arcing at a connection point. A raised boss (220a, 220b) is formed to surround the aperture (126) on at least one of the opposing face surfaces of the tongue (116), the raised boss providing an electrically conductive surface of the terminal (100) free from the layer of insulation material for connection to a connection point.