Archery Sight Mark Calculator for Arrow Trajectory Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current archery sight-setting methods are inefficient and imprecise, requiring long-distance shots and extensive time for setup, especially for multi-pin sights, due to the inability to accurately account for arrow drag and flight trajectory variations, leading to reduced accuracy and increased complexity.

Innovation Solution

The use of portable electronic devices with graphical user interfaces to generate and display precise archery sight marks based on measured arrow drag and time-of-flight data, allowing for real-time adjustments and simplifying the sight-in process by using a single sight mark as a reference for multiple distances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional archery sight-setting methods are used, then the process can be completed with basic equipment, but the time required for setup increases and accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesight-setting accuracyVSAvoidsetup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculations of arrow trajectory, drag, and time-of-flight using a computational model before the archer actually sets the sights. By pre-calculating the optimal sight settings based on measured arrow parameters, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming trial shots and adjustments at the range, directly resolving the contradiction between accuracy and setup time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical trial-and-error sight-setting process with a computational system that uses electronic measurements of arrow drag and time-of-flight combined with mathematical modeling. This substitution of mechanical adjustment with computational calculation achieves higher precision while significantly reducing the time required for setup

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If traditional trajectory estimation methods are used, then the process is simpler, but the accuracy of point-of-impact prediction decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepoint-of-impact accuracyVSAvoidsight-setting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces simple trajectory estimation with a computational model that incorporates measured arrow drag and time-of-flight data. By substituting rough estimates with physics-based calculations using electronic measurements, the system achieves superior point-of-impact accuracy while managing complexity through automated computation rather than manual complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual model of the arrow's flight trajectory based on measured parameters, allowing the archer to simulate and predict point-of-impact before actual shooting. This virtual copy of the flight path enables accurate prediction without requiring complex physical trial shots

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sight pins are used for different distances, then versatility is improved, but the complexity of setting up and adjusting the sight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedistance coverageVSAvoidsight-adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides universal sight-setting capability for multiple distances through a single computational model that can calculate optimal settings for any range. By replacing multiple physical sight pins with a versatile calculation system, the patent achieves multi-distance adaptability while actually simplifying the adjustment process, as the system generates settings for all distances rather than requiring manual adjustment of multiple pins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If theoretical arrow characteristics are used for sight-setting, then the process is faster, but the accuracy decreases due to unaccounted drag variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesight-setting speedVSAvoidtrajectory accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces theoretical arrow characteristics with actual measured drag and time-of-flight data obtained through electronic sensors. By substituting theoretical models with empirical measurements, the system achieves both speed (through automated calculation) and accuracy (through real data), resolving the contradiction between productivity and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces the time and complexity of setting up archery sights, increases accuracy, and allows for precise sight pin settings without the need for long-distance shots, making it suitable for a wider range of archers and facilities.

Implementation Method 1

The effect of gravity on the arrow's flight acts to draw the arrow back toward the ground as the arrow travels from the archer toward the target

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

the arrow's launch speed and drag also affect the amount of pitch that must be provided at launch to strike a point-of-aim on a target, because both the arrow's drag and its speed effect the time-of-flight from launch to impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS9441913B1Apparatus, system and method for archery sight settings
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 FULL FLIGHT TECH LLC
  • US9441913B1 patent drawing
  • US9441913B1 patent drawing
  • US9441913B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-transitory computer-readable medium whose contents cause a processing device including a touch screen display to perform a method for generating an archery sight setting, the method including acts of rendering a graphical user interface in the touch screen display, receiving a first input to the graphical user interface to select at least one archery parameter, and presenting a plurality of sight marks in the graphical user interface including at least a first sight mark and a second sight mark, the plurality of sight marks scaled within the graphical user interface to provide a 1:1 ratio between a first distance separating the first sight mark and the second sight mark in the graphical user interface and a second distance separating a first sighted-in position and a second sighted-in position in an archery sight including at least one mechanically-adjusted sight pin.