Architectural Planning System Using Dynamic Stacking Diagrams

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional architectural and space planning processes are time-consuming and prone to human errors, requiring numerous iterations and meetings to develop a suitable building plan, often resulting in misplacement of departments, redundant space, or inadequate space allocation.

Innovation Solution

An architectural planning system utilizing a video screen to display organizational data, a blocking diagram for floor plans, and a stacking diagram for dynamic placement of groups, allowing for real-time collaboration and immediate modifications to optimize the placement of organizational groups within building spaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional manual planning processes are used, then building planners can develop floor plans through iterative meetings and proposals, but the process becomes time-consuming and prone to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of department placementVSAvoidplanning process duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical planning processes with a computer-based automated system that uses algorithms to evaluate organizational data, interaction levels, and spatial constraints, thereby eliminating human error while reducing planning time through automated optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of organizational structures, departmental relationships, and floor plan geometries, allowing for virtual manipulation and optimization without physical constraints, enabling rapid iteration and error-free replication of successful layouts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple iterations and meetings are conducted to refine floor plans, then department placement accuracy can be improved, but the complexity of the planning process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace allocation accuracyVSAvoidplanning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms qualitative planning parameters (department importance, interaction frequency) into quantitative measurable parameters that can be processed algorithmically, enabling precise optimization without requiring complex manual evaluation and multiple revision cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If building planners manually assign physical locations to departments, then flexibility in adjusting layouts is maintained, but human errors such as misplacement and redundant space allocation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout adjustment flexibilityVSAvoidcorrectness of space allocation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates automated feedback mechanisms that continuously evaluate department placement against organizational data, interaction requirements, and spatial constraints, providing real-time correction of errors while maintaining flexibility through iterative optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The planning system performs self-correction by automatically detecting and resolving errors in department placement, space allocation, and layout optimization without requiring manual intervention, thereby eliminating human errors while preserving adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9430749B2Architectural planning system and process therefor
Publication Date: 2016.08.30 HAWORTH INC
  • US9430749B2 patent drawing
  • US9430749B2 patent drawing
  • US9430749B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An architectural planning system, that includes software and the process thereof, which actively tracks the relationship of organizational groups as well as the required connections therebetween, which information can be actively taken into account during an architectural planning phase. Generally, this provides an improved software tool and process for planning the physical locations of organizational groups within the building space. Further, changes in organizational needs can be readily modified and adapted through direct and dynamic collaboration between these parties.