Arcuate Granule Coating for Uniform Asphalt Sheet Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing methods for asphaltic articles struggle to achieve even, consistent, and thorough granule coverage, which is crucial for reflective properties and durability, as uncovered areas reduce reflectivity and expose the asphalt to damage.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the application of liquid asphalt to a reinforcing sheet, bending it to form an arcuate surface, and applying granules in multiple stages with varying sizes to ensure comprehensive coverage, with the second coating applied over an arcuate surface to fill voids and enhance adhesion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If granules are applied by dropping from a hopper onto a flat asphaltic sheet, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the granule coverage is uneven and inconsistent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranule coverage uniformityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The asphaltic sheet is bent into an arcuate configuration before granule application. This curvature causes granules dropped from the hopper to roll across the surface, improving coverage uniformity. The curved surface ensures granules distribute more evenly compared to a flat surface where granules simply accumulate at the drop location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The asphaltic sheet is pre-bent into an arcuate shape before granules are applied. This preliminary action of curving the sheet prepares the surface to naturally distribute granules more uniformly during the dropping process, eliminating the need for complex granule distribution mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If a single coating of granules is applied, then the manufacturing process is fast, but the coverage is insufficient and uncovered portions reduce reflectivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegranule coverage thoroughnessVSAvoidmanufacturing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The granule application process is divided into multiple stages: first applying granules to a flat sheet, then bending the sheet and applying additional granules to the arcuate surface. This segmentation allows each coating stage to target specific coverage needs, achieving thorough coverage without requiring excessive granules in a single pass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The process transitions from applying granules only to a flat two-dimensional surface to applying granules to both the flat surface and the three-dimensional arcuate surface. This dimensional change allows granules to be applied from different angles and positions, filling voids and achieving more complete coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Illumination intensity

If larger granules are used, then the reflectivity is improved, but the coverage becomes less thorough due to larger voids between granules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolar reflectivityVSAvoidsurface coverage completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Different granule sizes are applied at different stages and locations. Larger granules are applied first to the flat surface where they provide maximum reflectivity, then smaller granules are applied to the arcuate surface to fill the voids between the larger granules. Each location receives the appropriate granule size for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The granule coating becomes a composite structure with larger granules providing the primary reflective surface and smaller granules filling the interstitial spaces. This composite approach combines the reflectivity benefits of large granules with the coverage completeness of small granules, achieving both goals simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly increases granule coverage and reflectivity, demonstrated by improved solar reflectance ratings, ensuring a more durable and aesthetically pleasing roofing material.

Implementation Method 1

Current production methods often utilize gravity by dropping the granules from a hopper onto a tacky asphaltic sheet where the granules are adhered

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

dropping the granules from a hopper onto a tacky asphaltic sheet where the granules are adhered

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS8993047B2Method of manufacturing granule coated asphaltic articles
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 AMRIZE TECHNOLOGY SWITZERLAND LLC
  • US8993047B2 patent drawing
  • US8993047B2 patent drawing
  • US8993047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of manufacturing a granule coated asphaltic article comprising the steps of applying liquid asphalt to a reinforcing sheet to create an asphaltic sheet, the asphaltic sheet having a top surface and a bottom surface; bending the asphaltic sheet to form an arcuate top surface of the sheet; and applying a coating of granules over the arcuate top surface of the asphaltic sheet.