Area Generation Device Using Gradient Search for Event Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to accurately extract areas with dense event occurrences from a two-dimensional plane, either by strictly limiting shape and size or resulting in overly complex shapes that do not naturally represent the event distribution.

Innovation Solution

A computer-readable storage medium and device that generates an adjacency matrix from divided areas, uses an evaluation function combining distribution data and adjacency relations, and applies a gradient method search to determine optimal areas with dense event occurrences, allowing for flexible shape evaluation and reducing complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If strict shape and size limitations are imposed on extracted areas, then the extraction process becomes simpler and more controlled, but the fitting accuracy to actual event distributions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction process complexityVSAvoidfitting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameter of area shape from fixed geometric constraints to flexible boundary definitions based on event distribution data. The boundary is dynamically adjusted to fit the actual spatial pattern of events, transforming the extraction from a rigid geometric process to an adaptive statistical process that maintains simplicity while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The extracted area boundaries are made dynamic rather than static. Instead of using predetermined geometric shapes, the boundaries continuously adapt to the underlying event distribution patterns in the data, allowing the extraction process to respond to the actual spatial characteristics of the events being analyzed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If no shape restrictions are imposed on extracted areas, then the fitting accuracy to event distributions improves, but the resulting shapes become overly complex and lose interpretability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefitting accuracyVSAvoidshape complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies different qualities to different parts of the extracted area. The boundary follows the event distribution closely in regions where events are dense, while maintaining smoother transitions in regions with lower event density. This local adaptation allows high fitting accuracy where needed while preventing overall shape complexity from becoming excessive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of creating entirely new complex shapes, the invention copies and adapts the underlying event distribution pattern itself to define the area boundary. The boundary essentially traces the spatial footprint of the events, creating a shape that naturally fits the data without requiring complex geometric constructions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If conventional extraction methods are used, then the processing approach remains simple and intuitive, but the ability to accurately represent natural event distributions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing simplicityVSAvoidevent distribution representation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces mechanical geometric construction methods with statistical and computational approaches. Instead of manually defining or rigidly constraining area shapes, the system uses algorithms to automatically determine boundaries based on event distribution patterns, substituting computational processing for mechanical geometric operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11138283B2Device and method for area generation
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 FUJITSU LTD
  • US11138283B2 patent drawing
  • US11138283B2 patent drawing
  • US11138283B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A storage medium storing a program that causes a processor to execute for acquiring distribution data indicating a distribution of spots in an area to be searched, and area data indicating positions of divided areas obtained by dividing the area to be searched; generating an adjacency matrix indicating an adjacency relation between the divided areas from the area data; generating an evaluation function for evaluating selection of the divided areas using: a variable indicating selection of consecutive divided areas, the distribution data, and the adjacency matrix; calculating a gradient of a value of the evaluation function from a current value of the variable; executing a gradient method search for updating the value of the variable using the calculated gradient; and determining selection of the divided areas as an optimal area for event occurrence analysis based on a result of the gradient method search.