ARIMA Hyperparameter Tuning With Derivative-Free Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for estimating hyperparameters in ARIMA models are insufficient, complicating the model configuration and affecting the quality of predictions.

Innovation Solution

A method for tuning ARIMA model hyperparameters using a derivative-free approach, involving the determination of initial values, fitting the model, selecting a tuning method, computing objective function values, and updating hyperparameters until a stopping criterion is reached, to output tuned hyperparameter values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing techniques are used for estimating hyperparameters in ARIMA models, then the model configuration process is simplified, but the prediction quality deteriorates due to insufficient hyperparameter estimation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehyperparameter estimation accuracyVSAvoidmodel configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining initial hyperparameter values and conducting the entire tuning process without manual intervention. The processor autonomously executes the methodology to optimize hyperparameters, eliminating the need for expert manual configuration while achieving high estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically determining initial hyperparameter values before the actual model training and tuning process. This preliminary step establishes a strong foundation for subsequent optimization, reducing the overall complexity of model configuration while ensuring high initial estimation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If manual hyperparameter tuning is performed to improve prediction accuracy, then the prediction quality improves, but the time and computational resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidhyperparameter tuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical tuning processes with an automated computational methodology. The processor executes the tuning algorithm, substituting human expert manual adjustment with an efficient automated system that achieves the same or better accuracy while significantly reducing the time and computational resources required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system efficiently explores hyperparameter space by systematically changing parameters according to the tuning methodology. This structured approach to parameter changes allows the system to find optimal values quickly without exhaustive search, balancing prediction accuracy with computational efficiency and time constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive hyperparameter estimation is performed to improve model quality, then the prediction reliability improves, but the computational complexity and resource requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidestimation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the hyperparameter estimation process into distinct phases: determining initial values, fitting the model, selecting tuning methods, computing objective function values, and updating parameters. This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently, achieving high prediction reliability while managing computational complexity through structured modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by computing objective function values based on time-series data and using these results to guide subsequent hyperparameter updates. This feedback loop ensures that the tuning process systematically improves prediction reliability while avoiding unnecessary computational complexity through data-driven decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12380369B1Hyperparameter tuning in autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 SAS INSTITUTE INC
  • US12380369B1 patent drawing
  • US12380369B1 patent drawing
  • US12380369B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method include tuning hyperparameters for an ARIMA model using a derivative free approach by determining a set of initial hyperparameter values, fitting an ARIMA model to the set of initial hyperparameter values, selecting a tuning method for the set of hyperparameters, responsive to selecting a single-objective method, computing a first objective function value from time-series data applied to the ARIMA model based on the set of initial hyperparameter values, or responsive to selecting a multi-objective method, computing at least a second objective function value and a third objective function value from the time-series data applied to the ARIMA model based on the set of initial hyperparameter values, determining whether a stopping criterion for tuning the set of hyperparameters has reached, responsive to determining that the stopping criteria has reached, outputting a set of tuned hyperparameter values.