Armature Core Teeth Width Ratio for Reluctance Torque

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotating electric machines with full-pitch winding achieve high torque but are complex and costly, while short-pitch winding results in low winding factor and inefficient magnetic flux utilization, and existing patents do not adequately address the impact of armature core design on performance, particularly the radial width of the back yoke, leading to leakage magnetic flux and reduced reluctance torque.

Innovation Solution

The armature core design includes a back yoke, large-width teeth, and small-width teeth with a specific radial and circumferential width ratio, allowing magnetic flux to efficiently flow from large-width teeth to small-width teeth via the back yoke, reducing leakage flux and increasing magnetic flux between the small-width teeth and the rotor, thereby enhancing reluctance torque.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If full-pitch winding is used, then high torque performance is achieved, but the winding process becomes complicated and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque performanceVSAvoidwinding process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The armature core teeth are segmented into two types: first teeth with larger circumferential width and second teeth with smaller circumferential width. This segmentation allows different winding configurations on different teeth, enabling the use of simpler short-pitch winding while maintaining high torque performance through optimized magnetic flux distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the armature core are given different properties: the first teeth have larger width to accommodate full-pitch winding sections for high torque, while the second teeth have smaller width for short-pitch winding sections. This local differentiation allows the machine to achieve high performance without the complexity of full-pitch winding throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of moving object

If short-pitch winding is used, then the overall length of the armature coil is reduced, but the winding factor becomes low and magnetic flux utilization is inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearmature coil lengthVSAvoidwinding factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The armature core teeth are segmented into two types: first teeth with larger circumferential width and second teeth with smaller circumferential width. This segmentation allows different winding configurations on different teeth, enabling the use of simpler short-pitch winding while maintaining high torque performance through optimized magnetic flux distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The back yoke acts as an intermediary magnetic path that connects the first teeth and second teeth. By optimizing its radial width, it facilitates efficient magnetic flux flow between different tooth types, compensating for the lower winding factor of short-pitch winding and improving overall magnetic flux utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If the radial width of the back yoke is increased, then structural strength is improved, but magnetic flux leakage increases and reluctance torque decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveback yoke strengthVSAvoidreluctance torque
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The radial width of the back yoke is optimized to a specific range (4.0-6.0 mm) that balances structural strength requirements with magnetic flux flow requirements. This parameter optimization ensures sufficient mechanical strength while preventing magnetic flux leakage, thereby maintaining high reluctance torque.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The armature core uses high-permeability magnetic material with optimized geometric parameters. The combination of specific back yoke width, tooth width variations, and magnetic material properties creates a composite structure that simultaneously provides mechanical strength and efficient magnetic flux conduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration increases the total torque of the rotating electric machine by optimizing magnetic flux distribution and reducing leakage, outperforming conventional designs in torque generation.

Implementation Method 1

magnetic flux, which is generated upon energization of the armature coil wound on the large-width teeth, to flow to the small-width teeth via the back yoke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the amount of magnetic flux flowing between the small-width teeth and the rotor of the rotating electric machine is increased, making it easy to obtain reluctance torque

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic reluctance: Magnetic Reluctance

Data Source

PatentUS10862355B2Armature with a core having teeth of different circumferential widths and electric motor including the armature and a rotor
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 DENSO CORP
  • US10862355B2 patent drawing
  • US10862355B2 patent drawing
  • US10862355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An armature includes a multi-phase armature coil and an armature core. The armature core includes a back yoke, a plurality of large-width teeth and a plurality of small-width teeth having a smaller circumferential width than the large-width teeth. The large-width teeth each radially protrude from the back yoke and are spaced from one another in a circumferential direction of the armature core. The large-width teeth have the armature coil concentratedly wound thereon. The small-width teeth each radially protrude from the back yoke and are spaced from one another in the circumferential direction of the armature core. The small-width teeth are arranged alternately with the large-width teeth in the circumferential direction of the armature core. Moreover, 1≤W1/W2≤2, where W1 is a radial width of the back yoke and W2 is the circumferential width of the small-width teeth.