MARPOL Compliant Bunker Fuel Production via Aromatic Enrichment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The production of low sulfur bunker fuel oil with a pour point below +9°C is challenging due to the precipitation of asphaltenes when paraffinic cutter stock is added in excess, affecting the stability and flash point specifications of the fuel.

Innovation Solution

An integrated process involving mild thermal cracking of residue feedstock, followed by fractionation and in-situ aromatic enrichment of the 140-280°C boiling range stream with straight run kerosene, resulting in a low pour point and high flash point MARPOL compliant bunker fuel oil.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If paraffinic cutter stock is added in excess quantity to reduce pour point, then the pour point specification is improved, but asphaltenes precipitate and fuel oil stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepour pointVSAvoidfuel oil stability
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the cutter stock by using aromatic hydrocarbons instead of paraffinic hydrocarbons. This parameter change allows achieving the desired pour point reduction without causing asphaltene precipitation, as aromatics have different solubility characteristics with asphaltenes compared to paraffins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite fuel oil composition by blending aromatic hydrocarbons with the residual fuel oil. This composite approach allows the aromatic component to modify the physical properties (lowering pour point) while maintaining compositional stability, avoiding the harmful effects of pure paraffinic blends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Temperature

If paraffinic cutter stock is added in excess quantity to reduce pour point, then the pour point specification is improved, but flash point specification is affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepour pointVSAvoidflash point
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical type of cutter stock from paraffinic to aromatic hydrocarbons. This parameter change simultaneously achieves pour point reduction while preserving flash point integrity, as aromatic hydrocarbons have different volatility characteristics compared to paraffinic hydrocarbons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If hydrogen based technology is used to produce low sulfur fuel, then sulfur content is reduced, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesulfur contentVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes sulfur from the residual fuel oil through hydrodesulfurization process, separating sulfur compounds from the hydrocarbon matrix. This extraction approach achieves low sulfur content without requiring expensive hydrogen-based refining processes, using instead catalytic hydrodesulfurization with hydrogen gas generated in-situ.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a self-service sulfur removal system where hydrogen gas is generated within the same processing unit through catalytic reforming of the residual fuel oil itself. This eliminates the need for external hydrogen supply and reduces overall processing costs while achieving effective sulfur removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If thermal cracking process is used to produce bunker fuel, then fuel production is achieved, but meeting all required specifications becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel productionVSAvoidspecification compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the thermal cracking process into distinct functional units: cracking section, fractionation section, and blending section. This segmentation allows each unit to be optimized for its specific function, enabling better control over product specifications while maintaining high fuel production rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms in the blending section where the cracked products are blended with cutter stock and other fuels, with continuous monitoring of specifications. This feedback loop allows real-time adjustment of blend ratios to ensure compliance with MARPOL and other relevant specifications while maximizing fuel production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process produces bunker fuel oil with a pour point of +9°C, meeting stringent MARPOL specifications, enhancing stability and reducing the need for additional cutter stock, while maintaining low sulfur content and high flash point.

Implementation Method 1

mild thermal cracking of residue feed stock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cracking: Pyrolysis

Implementation Method 2

fractionation of products obtained by visbreaking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFractionation: Distillation

Implementation Method 3

in-situ aromatic enrichment of a stream generated from fractionation of products from thermal cracking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExtraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS11345866B2Process for production of MARPOL compliant bunker fuel from petroleum residues
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 INDIAN OIL CORP LTD
  • US11345866B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This invention relates to production of low sulfur MARPOL compliant bunker fuel oil and distillates using high sulfur residue, low sulfur residue and/or blend of high and low sulfur residue feed stock. The invention also describes a method for production of a cutterstock stream having a lower paraffin and higher aromatic content than a feed stream using a paraffin separation section and its blending to produce bunker fuel.