Arousal Level Control Apparatus Using Optimization Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing arousal level control systems struggle to accurately predict the effect of environmental changes on arousal levels, leading to suboptimal control of arousal levels in environments such as offices and vehicles.

Innovation Solution

An arousal level control apparatus that uses an optimization model to calculate setting values for environmental control devices, incorporating physical quantity prediction and arousal level prediction models to maximize the objective function of arousal level variation, while ensuring the setting values are within a predetermined range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If environmental control devices are adjusted to improve arousal level, then work efficiency and alertness are improved, but comfort level and user acceptance may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearousal level control accuracyVSAvoidenvironmental comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts environmental parameters (temperature, lighting intensity, humidity) based on predicted arousal level changes. By optimizing these parameters within specific ranges, the system achieves both improved arousal control accuracy and maintained environmental comfort, resolving the contradiction between control effectiveness and user comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor actual arousal level changes and compare them with predicted values. Based on this feedback, the system refines its control strategies, ensuring that environmental adjustments reliably improve arousal while maintaining comfort through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If multiple environmental factors are controlled simultaneously to maximize arousal improvement, then control effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearousal control effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the environmental control into independent controllable factors (temperature, lighting, humidity) and manages them separately through individual prediction models and control strategies. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple factors simultaneously without proportionally increasing overall system complexity, as each factor can be optimized independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a unified optimization framework that can handle multiple environmental factors through a single integrated approach. The prediction model and control algorithm are designed to accommodate various environmental parameters universally, reducing the need for separate specialized systems for each factor and thereby limiting complexity growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If prediction models are made more accurate to better predict arousal changes, then control precision is improved, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearousal level prediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes prediction model parameters and selects appropriate model complexities based on the specific task requirements and available data. By dynamically adjusting model parameters rather than using fixed complex models, the system achieves high prediction accuracy while keeping computational requirements manageable, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12207928B2Arousal level control apparatus, arousal level control method, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 NEC CORP
  • US12207928B2 patent drawing
  • US12207928B2 patent drawing
  • US12207928B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arousal level control apparatus calculates a setting value of a control device under a constraint condition using an arousal level optimization model so that a value of an objective function is maximized. The control device affects a physical quantity of a surrounding environment that affects arousal level of a subject. The arousal level optimization model includes the constraint condition and the objective function. The constraint condition includes a physical quantity prediction model, an arousal level prediction model, and a setting value range condition that the setting value is within a predetermined range. The physical quantity prediction model is an explicit function that includes the physical quantity and the setting value as explanatory variables and has a predicted value of the physical quantity as an explained variable.